Bild Credit: UN PhotoGill Fickling Um die Welt Hungerkrise zu lösen, ist es notwendig, mehr zu tun, als Notfall-Nahrungsmittelhilfe für Länder, die Hungersnot aussenden. Die Führungskräfte müssen das globalisierte System der landwirtschaftlichen Produktion und des Handels ansprechen, das große landwirtschaftliche und exportorientierte Kulturpflanzen begünstigt, während sie die Kleinbauern und die Landwirtschaft, die auf die lokalen Bedürfnisse ausgerichtet sind, diskriminieren. Als Folge der offiziellen Untätigkeit sterben jährlich mehr als 30 Millionen Menschen an Unterernährung und Hungersnot, während große Industriebetriebe immer mehr Erdbeeren exportieren und Blumen zu wohlhabenden Verbrauchern schneiden. Die übermäßige Fleischproduktion, die weitgehend für die Wohlhabenden notwendig ist, erfordert massive Mengen an Futterkörnern, die sonst arme Familien unterstützen könnten. Giant Agribusiness, Chemie-und Restaurant-Unternehmen wie Cargill, Monsanto und McDonalds dominieren die Welten Lebensmittelkette, eine globale Abhängigkeit von ungesunden und genetisch gefährlichen Produkten. Diese Unternehmen rasen, um Patente auf jedem pflanzlichen und lebenden Organismus zu sichern und ihre intensive Werbung versucht, die Welten zu überzeugen, mehr und mehr Süßigkeiten, Snacks, Burger und alkoholfreie Getränke zu essen. GPF-Perspektiven Dieses Papier diskutiert die Hauptursachen für das steile Vorfeld der weltweiten Nahrungsmittelpreise und die daraus resultierende Ausbreitung des Hungers auf fast eine Milliarde Menschen weltweit. Die Autoren James A. Paul und Katarina Wahlberg kommen zu dem Schluss, dass Biokraftstoffe und der agroindustrielle Ansatz für die Nahrungsmittelproduktion die Hauptschuldigen der Nahrungsmittelkrise sind. Das Papier befasst sich mit einer Vielzahl von Faktoren, die die Ernährung für alle gefährden, einschließlich des Bevölkerungswachstums, des nicht nachhaltigen Konsums, der internationalen Handelspolitik und des Klimawandels. Die Autoren argumentieren für eine effektive und großzügige kurzfristige Hilfe sowie eine längerfristige Umwandlung des landwirtschaftlichen Systems, um sie gerechter zu verteilen, widerstandsfähig und nachhaltig für die Zukunft zu machen. (Global Policy ForumFriedrich Ebert Stiftung) Global Policy Foren Katarina Wahlberg kritisiert den Vorschlag der Weltbank, eine Grüne Revolution in Afrika zu schaffen. Durch die Fokussierung auf die Förderung der landwirtschaftlichen Produktion durch die wissenschaftliche Entwicklung von produktiveren Kulturen, ignoriert die Bank die Tatsache, dass die biologischen Systeme der Erde nicht für immer ausgenutzt werden können. Auch die Unterstützer der neuen Grünen Revolution begegnen nicht den Hauptursachen der globalen Nahrungsmittelkrise, einschließlich der Produktion von Biokraftstoffen und dem nicht nachhaltigen weltweiten Konsum von Fleisch. Der Autor fordert eine Verschiebung von der industriellen Landwirtschaft der Exportkulturen zur nachhaltigen Landwirtschaft für den lokalen Verbrauch. (World Economy amp Entwicklung in Kürze) Global Policy Foren Katarina Wahlberg warnt davor, dass zum ersten Mal seit Jahrzehnten die weltweite Knappheit der Nahrung zu einem Problem wird. Die steigende Nachfrage nach Getreide für den Lebensmittelverbrauch, die Viehfutter und insbesondere die Produktion von Biokraftstoffen treibt die Lebensmittelpreise auf Rekordniveau an. Vor allem die Armen, die eine Mehrheit ihres Einkommens auf Nahrung ausgeben, werden leiden. Um die Sache noch schlimmer zu machen, beeinträchtigt die Nahrungsmittelpreiserhöhung auch die Menge der verfügbaren Nahrungsmittelhilfe, da die Regierungen die Finanzierung des UN-Welternährungsprogramms nicht erhöht haben. (World Economy amp Entwicklung in Kürze) UN-Dokumente Die Agrarökologie kann die Weltenfutterproduktion innerhalb von 10 Jahren verdoppeln, den Klimawandel mildern und die ländliche Armut lindern. Ökologische Methoden erhöhen die Bodenproduktivität und schützen die Kulturen gegen Schädlinge, indem sie sich auf die natürliche Umwelt verlassen. Dieser Bericht von Olivier de Schutter, Sonderberichterstatter der Vereinten Nationen über das Recht auf Nahrung, fordert die Staaten auf, ihre Bevölkerung zu ernähren, indem sie die effizienten landwirtschaftlichen Techniken anwendet. Die konventionelle Landwirtschaft, die auf teure Inputs angewiesen ist, treibt den Klimawandel tatsächlich an und ist nicht belastbar gegen Klimaschocks. Die Fischerei unterstützt den Lebensunterhalt von über 540 Millionen Menschen und Fischprodukte sind die weltweit am meisten gehandelten Lebensmittel Ware. Nach dem Stand der Welten Fischerei und Aquakultur Bericht globale wilde Lebensmittelbestände haben abgelehnt und Fischzucht kann nicht halten ihre jüngsten Wachstum. Der Bericht untersucht verstärkte Anstrengungen zur Durchsetzung von Handelsmaßnahmen und gegen illegale, nicht gemeldete und unregulierte Fischerei sowie die Notwendigkeit einer nachhaltigen Bewirtschaftung der Fischerei, die von den politischen Entscheidungsträgern oft übersehen wird. (FAO) UN-Sonderberichterstatter für das Recht auf Nahrung, Olivier de Schutter, empfiehlt Chinas bemerkenswerten sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Fortschritt in den letzten drei Jahrzehnten. China hat Hunderte von Millionen Menschen aus der Armut aufgehoben. Allerdings gibt es Probleme mit dem Klimawandel, dem Schrumpfen von Ackerland und Landabbau, die die landwirtschaftliche Produktion bedrohen. De Schutter empfiehlt, dass China auf ein nachhaltigeres Landwirtschaftssystem zugreifen wird, um das derzeitige Produktionsniveau aufrechtzuerhalten. Unveränderliche Käufermacht in globalen Nahrungsmittelversorgungsketten schaden Kleinbauern. UNO-Sonderberichterstatter für das Recht auf Nahrung, Olivier de Schutter, behauptet, dass das Wettbewerbsrecht den Missbrauch dominanter Käufermacht von globalen Agrarunternehmen ansprechen kann. Das Wettbewerbsrecht kann das Recht auf Nahrung schützen, so dass globale Nahrungsmittelversorgungsketten die ländliche Armut verringern können. Die UN-Konferenz über Handel und Entwicklung hat einen Policy-Brief veröffentlicht, in dem die Auswirkungen des Klimawandels auf die Landwirtschaft skizziert wurden. Für viele Entwicklungsländer ist der Agrarsektor äußerst wichtig. Auch wenn ein Klimawandel ernsthafte nachteilige Folgen für die Ernährungssicherheit haben kann, kann der Agrarsektor Teil einer Lösung sein, um negative Effekte zu mildern. Dieser Brief behauptet die Notwendigkeit einer signifikanten Verschiebung von konventionellen Methoden zu nachhaltigen Nahrungsmittelproduktionssystemen, die die Produktivität von Kleinbauern verbessern. (UNCTAD) FAOs jährliche Flaggschiff-Publikation, Der Staat der Ernährung und Landwirtschaft bietet wissenschaftliche Bewertung der aktuellen Fragen in der Ernährung und Landwirtschaft Debatte. In diesem Bericht wird auf die rasche Expansion des Viehsektors hingewiesen - angetrieben durch Bevölkerungswachstum, Urbanisierung und steigender Wohlstand. Sie unterstreicht die Notwendigkeit einer breiteren Politik zur Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums und eine verstärkte Regierungsführung des Viehsektors, um sicherzustellen, dass ihre Auswirkungen auf die Umwelt begrenzt sind. (FAO) Das Umweltprogramm der Vereinten Nationen (UNEP) hat einen neuen Bericht über die Verbindung zwischen der Umwelt und der Nahrungsmittelkrise veröffentlicht. Umweltzerstörung und Verluste von Ackerland und Biodiversität bedrohen die Nahrungsmittelproduktion. Der Bericht analysiert die Auswirkungen von Ökocide auf den landwirtschaftlichen Ertrag und das Nahrungsmittelsystem und fordert nachhaltige Investitionen zusammen mit der Politikregulierung des Lebensmittelmarktes. (UNEP) Nahrungsmittelkrise und Klimawandel sind eine anspruchsvolle Landwirtschaft. Die Nahrungsmittel - und Landwirtschaftsorganisation (FAO) hat einen neuen Bericht veröffentlicht, der darauf hinweist, dass die Landwirtschaft die Treibhausgasemissionen bei gleichzeitiger Erhaltung der Treibhausgasemissionen wesentlich beiträgt. Einer der Schlüsselfaktoren für die Minderung des Klimawandels und die Erfüllung der Nahrungsmittelnachfrage ist die Wiederherstellung der organischen Böden. Der Bericht fordert eine ganzheitlichere Vision, die über enge und nicht nachhaltige Lösungen hinausgeht. (FAO) Die kommerzielle Saatgutproduktion, ein Markt, der von einigen transnationalen Unternehmen dominiert wird, reduziert die Biodiversität. Der Sonderberichterstatter für das Recht auf Nahrung, Olivier de Schutter, ist besorgt über die Abhängigkeit der Kleinbauern auf diese großen Unternehmen. Er spricht auch den ungleichen Wettbewerb zwischen dem kommerziellen und traditionellen Saatgut-System an. Er fordert Investitionen und Maßnahmen, die Kleinbauern in Entwicklungsländern und nicht großen Produzenten oder Privatanlegern begünstigen. (UNDPI) Diese Erklärung fordert UN-Mitglieder und internationale Agenturen auf, kurz-, mittel - und langfristige Lösungen für die globale Nahrungsmittelkrise zu implementieren. Der Text fordert die Mitgliedstaaten auf, die Beihilfen für Kleinbauern in den betroffenen Ländern zu erhöhen und Investitionen für die Forschung zur Förderung der Nahrungsmittelproduktion zu erhöhen. Die Weltführer konnten sich nicht auf die spezifischen Ursachen der Nahrungsmittelkrise einigen, einschließlich der Rolle, die die Produktion von Biokraftstoffen spielte. Stattdessen empfiehlt die Erklärung eine weitere Untersuchung der Auswirkungen, die die Biokraftstoffproduktion auf die Ernährungssicherheit hat. (Nahrungsmittel - und Landwirtschaftsorganisation) Die Nahrungsmittel - und Landwirtschaftsorganisation (FAO) prognostiziert, dass, obwohl die globale Getreideproduktion im Jahr 2008 zunehmen wird, die Preise auf Rekordhöhe bleiben werden. Die Produktion wächst nicht schnell genug, um der starken Nachfrage gerecht zu werden, damit die Länder Getreidebestände weiter fallen werden. Der Großteil der Produktionssteigerung findet in den USA, der EU, China und Indien statt. Die Mehrheit der armen Länder wird einen Produktionsrückgang erleben, was sie noch stärker von den Importen abhängig macht und anfällig für höhere Getreidepreise ist. Artikel und Dokumente Die USAs National Family Farm Coalition warnt, dass Lebensmittelsicherheit sowie Landwirte Lebensunterhalt bedroht werden könnten, wenn Pläne für eine transatlantische Freihandelszone zustande kommen sollten. Die National Family Farm Coalition gehörte zu einer breiten Palette von zivilgesellschaftlichen Gruppen, die im Mai gegen eine Transatlantische Freihandelszone (TAFTA) in Arlington, USA, protestierten. Einer der Hauptaspekte der transatlantischen Verhandlungen ist die gegenseitige Anerkennung der Regeln und Vorschriften über Handel und Investitionen durch die USA und die EU. Hier liegt der Fokus nicht nur auf Tarifbarrieren, sondern auf dem, was sich die US-Regierung als hinter den Grenzpolitiken wie Gesundheit, Umwelt und Finanzschutz bezieht. Die Beseitigung dieser Handelsreizstoffe, wie sie von multinationalen Konzernen genannt wurden, wird in den laufenden EU-US-Gesprächen als Verringerung der nichttarifären Barrieren bezeichnet. (Rural21) Die ETC Group und EcoNexus haben Berichte über die Unternehmenssteuerung herausgegeben, die in der globalen Nahrungsmittelkette verankert ist. Die Berichte beruhen auf der Dominanz des Agrarsektors vor allem in den landwirtschaftlichen Inputs wie Tierfutterproduktion, Viehzucht, Düngemittelpestizide und Saatgutproduktion unter anderem. Ihre Erkenntnisse zeigen die Verwüstung, die diese Monopole den örtlichen Landwirten verursachen, da ihre örtlichen Rassen und Lebensmittelkulturen verloren gegangen sind. Die neue Allianz für Ernährungssicherheit und Ernährung, die auf dem G8-Gipfel im Jahr 2012 ins Leben gerufen wurde, verspricht, die Armut für 50 Millionen Menschen in den nächsten zehn Jahren zu senken, indem sie die privaten Investitionen und das landwirtschaftliche Wachstum in ausgewählten afrikanischen Ländern erhöht. Ein Jahr nach Beginn der Initiativen präsentiert der Nachweis eines neuen Oxfam Briefings über seine Umsetzung ein beunruhigendes Bild der bisherigen Leistung. (Oxfam) Es gibt eine Vielzahl von Vorschlägen, Strategien und Initiativen, wie die Ernährungssicherheit und die landwirtschaftliche Produktion zu verbessern. Möglicherweise fehlt ein Aspekt in diesen Debatten: Könnten Importbeschränkungen dazu beitragen, die landwirtschaftliche Produktion zu stimulieren und kleine Bauernfamilien zu nutzen Was sind die Voraussetzungen für eine rationale und intelligente Umsetzung der Handelsregulierung, um diese Ziele zu erreichen Diese Fragen werden von Uwe Hoering übernommen In seinem Bericht Alternativen zur Nahrungsmittelimportabhängigkeit, die er für FDCL schrieb, ein Forschungs - und Dokumentationsinstitut, das an Chile und Lateinamerika arbeitet. (FDCL) Eine Koalition von NGOs, darunter Freunde der Erde Europa, Oxfam, die Weltentwicklungsbewegung und SOMO haben die Position der EU-Finanzminister in Bezug auf die Finanzregulierung kritisiert. Sie sagen, die EU ignoriert, wie die Finanzinstitute weiterhin in Spekulationen speisen, was die Ernährungssicherheit gefährdet. Neue Regelungen sollen bis 2014 verabschiedet werden. (SOMO) Zwei deutsche NGOs, Brot fr die Welt und WWF Deutschland, kritisieren die jüngste Vereinbarung über die Reform der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik der EU, die den großen Agrarproduzenten in den EU-Ländern massive Subventionen gewährt . Nicht nur die Reform verpasst die Möglichkeit, einen bedeutenden Einfluss auf den Umweltschutz zu legen, aber es ignoriert auch die Exportsubventionen, die für die Landwirte im globalen Süden ein wichtiges Thema sind. Die Koalition der britischen NGOs sowie der deutsche NGO Misereor haben betont, dass die afrikanischen Organisationen der Zivilgesellschaft die G8 New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition ablehnen, so die Aussagen, dass beide Gruppen veröffentlicht wurden. Am vergangenen Wochenende fand in London die sogenannte Nutrition for Growth Gipfel in Erwartung der G8-Sitzung in diesem Monat in Nordirland statt. Die afrikanischen Organisationen der Zivilgesellschaft lehnen den G8-Ansatz ab und stellen ihre Legitimität in Bezug auf die Entscheidung über die afrikanische Ernährungssicherheit in Frage. (World Development Movement, Misereor) Deutschlands viertgrößte Bank, die DZ Bank und ihre Tochtergesellschaft Union Investment haben angekündigt, dass sie sich nach der NGO-Foodwatch nicht mehr mit Spekulationen mit Agrarrohstoffen beschäftigen werden. DZ Bank bestätigte dies durch einen Brief an Foodwatch geschickt. Die DZ Bank ist die jüngste von einer Reihe von Instituten, die ihre Entscheidung angekündigt haben, den Prozess der Spekulationen zu stoppen. (Foodwatch) Dürre und eine wachsende Bevölkerung haben die Nahrungssicherheit in Kenia belastet. Als Reaktion darauf ermutigt die kenianische Regierung die Reisbauern, eine landwirtschaftliche Technik namens System of Rice Intensification (SRI) anzunehmen, die in Indien weit verbreitet ist. Die Methode ermöglicht es den Landwirten, ihre Kulturen mit begrenztem Wasser zu wachsen, während sie höhere Erträge erzielen. Reis ist ein Grundnahrungsmittel der kenianischen Diät, aber die Produktion im Land stimmt nicht mit der Nachfrage überein und stützt sich stark auf Einfuhren aus Ländern Asiens. Das Reisintensivierungsprogramm zielt darauf ab, Kenia vor allem im Hinblick auf den Klimawandel autarker zu machen. FAO-Generaldirektor Jose Graziono da Silva zitiert die Kleinproduktion und die Erholung der landwirtschaftlichen Biodiversität als Weg zur Erhöhung der Ernährungssicherheit, vor allem in ländlichen Gebieten. Bei einem Besuch der Universität für Gastronomische Wissenschaften kritisierte er die Grüne Revolution der 1960er Jahre wegen ihrer Umweltzerstörung und nachteiligen Auswirkungen auf die Kulturpflanzen, die sich aus dem schweren Gewicht der chemischen Agrarmethoden ergeben. Er bemerkte die Notwendigkeit, traditionelle Kulturen wiederherzustellen, die lokale Produktion zu unterstützen und sie mit den Märkten zu verknüpfen, was eine Erhöhung ihres Einkommens ermöglicht. Er betonte die Rolle der Kulturen wie Quinoa im Kampf gegen den Hunger und verweist auf das UN-Internationale Jahr der Quinoa. Obwohl da Silvas Betonung auf die landwirtschaftliche und Ernährungsvielfalt und die Wiederentdeckung der verschiedenen Lebensmittel wichtig ist, ignoriert es Fragen im Zusammenhang mit Land Grabbing und Klimawandel. (FAO) Mars, Mondelez, Nestle verlassen Frauen Landwirte hinter (8. März 2013) Oxfam kritisiert Mars, Mondelez und Nestle für ihre ungleiche Behandlung von Frauen. Die Erforschung der ethischen Standards ihrer Versorgungskette hat ergeben, dass weibliche Kakaobauern im globalen Süden oft Diskriminierung ausgesetzt sind. Auch wenn Frauen im Produktionssystem entscheidend sind, erhalten sie oft ungleiche Bezahlung und werden häufig den Zugang zu Land, Kredit, Schulungen und Werkzeugen verweigert. Am Internationalen Frauentag kämpfte Oxfam, um die Unternehmen zu ermutigen, diese Probleme zu lösen und forderte sie auf, Schritte zu unternehmen, um ihre Produkte nachhaltiger zu machen. (Oxfam Pressemitteilung) Brasilien hat neue Initiativen zur Förderung von Nachhaltigkeit und Ernährung im Land eingeführt, indem es die Nutzung von lokal produzierten Produkten in Schulmahlzeiten fördert. Das Programm zielt darauf ab, die Produktion und den Verbrauch von hochwertigen Lebensmitteln von Kleinbauern zu unterstützen und ihre Sichtbarkeit auf dem lokalen Markt zu erhöhen. Die Regierung hofft, dass sie die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung, Ernährung und Ernährungssouveränität im Land anregen wird. Die Initiative folgt aus dem National School Fütterungsprogramm, das 1955 als Sozialhilfeprogramm zur Bekämpfung von Hungerstörungen ins Leben gerufen wurde. Heute liegt der Fokus auf der Schaffung eines lokalen Lebensmittelbeschaffungssystems und der Förderung von Transparenz und Rechenschaftspflicht im Schulmahlprogramm. (Al Jazeera) Oxfams Hinter dem Markenbericht beurteilt das ethische Verhalten der Top 10 Food Marken. Die Wohltätigkeitsorganisationen haben Unternehmen wie Nestl, Mars und Coco-Cola in Bezug auf ihr Verhalten gegenüber Frauenrechten bewertet. Land - und Wassernutzung Klimawandel Gemeinden Gemeinden halten Landwirte und Arbeiterrechte an. Der Bericht zeigt, dass diese Unternehmen, die den Lebensmittelmarkt dominieren und kollektiv über 1 Milliarde pro Tag machen, nicht ethischen Standards entsprechen. Associated British Foods (ABF), Besitzer von Marken wie Kingsmill, Ovaltine und Silverspoon bekam die niedrigste Punktzahl mit nur 13 von 70. Es erzielte eine arme von zehn in der Behandlung von Land, Frauen und Klimawandel. Oxfam hofft, Druck auf diese Unternehmen zu setzen, um zu überprüfen, wie ihre Aktivitäten auf Menschenrechte und die Umwelt einwirken. Allerdings ruft die Wohltätigkeitsorganisation die Konsumenten an, als die Regierungen, um diese Veränderung voranzutreiben. (Guardian) Dieser Artikel untersucht, wie die Junk-Food-Industrie treibt die Öffentlichkeit zu über-verbrauchen und süchtig nach verarbeitete Lebensmittel. Kolossale Mengen an Forschung, Geld und Technik gehen in den Prozess der Entdeckung, wie sie mehr Unzen in mehr Körper häufiger fahren können. Neben der Überlastung ihrer Produkte mit Zucker und Salz, um Sucht zu fördern, schaffen sie auch Produkte, die absichtlich langweilig im Geschmack sind und schmelzen, wenn sie gegessen werden, um das Gehirn in das Denken zu bringen, dass es keine Kalorien verbraucht hat, was dazu führt, dass der Verbraucher mehr essen und sehnen . Sie zielen auf Abschnitte der Bevölkerung ab, die anfälliger für Marketing und Sucht sind. Coca-Cola zum Beispiel, die sich auf ihre größten Verbraucher als schwere Benutzer bezieht, hat große Kampagnen in ärmeren und anfälligeren Bereichen wie New Orleans. Transnationale Unternehmen wie Kraft, Coca-Cola und Nestl ignorieren die gesundheitlichen Gefahren ihrer Gegenstände, oft entschuldigen sie ihr Verhalten, indem sie behaupten, dass es sich um Angebot und Nachfrage handelt. (New York Times) Im Rahmen der UNO-Initiative Think. Eat. Save haben sich Minister und hochrangige Beamte in Nairobi vor kurzem versammelt, um auf Nahrung zu speisen, die sonst für die Besprechung der EU-Lebensmittel ästhetischen Standards verworfen worden wäre. Die Veranstaltung wurde entworfen, um das Bewusstsein für die Kampagne zu schärfen, die darauf abzielt, globale Nahrungsmittelabfälle zu reduzieren, indem sie die Einstellung der Verbraucher und des Einzelhändlers gegenüber der Nahrung verändern. 1,6 Tonnen Lebensmittel wurden aus kenianischen Bauernhöfen gesammelt, die in Europa als untauglich angesehen wurden und bei dem Abendessen serviert wurden. Tristram Stuart, Gründer der Fütterung der 5000, eine Partnerorganisation zu Think. Eat. Save stellt fest, dass es ein Skandal ist, dass so viel Essen in einem Land mit Millionen von hungrigen Menschen verschwendet wird. Allerdings wird dieses Lebensmittel nicht bewirtschaftet, um die Millionen von Menschen zu ernähren, die unter Nahrungsmittelmangel in Kenia leiden, es ist für den Export in die EU bestimmt. Die Kampagne befasst sich nicht mit der Tatsache, dass das Vereinigte Königreich und andere EU-Länder ihr Essen in Afrika anfangen, ein wichtiges Thema innerhalb des modernen Nahrungsmittelsystems. (UN-Pressemitteilung) Im Dorf Darvesphura, in Indias ärmsten Staat, wachsen die Landwirte rekordverdächtige Mengen an Reis, ohne die Hilfe von GVO oder Herbiziden. Die Zunahme der Erträge ist eine direkte Folge einer landwirtschaftlichen Methode, die System of Rice Intensification (SRI) genannt wurde, das von Henri de Laulanie, einem französischen Jesuitenpriester und Agronom in Madagaskar in den 1980er Jahren, entwickelt wurde. Ein amerikanischer Professor, Norman Uphoff, zirkulierte die Methode in Asien, die dazu beigetragen hat, viele Menschen aus der Armut zu heben. Es wurde als eine neue grüne Graswurzel-Revolution beschrieben, ganz entgegengesetzt zur grünen Revolution der 1960er Jahre, die sich stark auf Technologie und Pestizide stützte. Die westlichen Regierungen halten sich jedoch davon ab, in die Methode zu investieren und lieber die technologische Forschung zu finanzieren. (Guardian) Quinoa: Zu kaufen oder nicht zu kaufen ist das die richtige Frage (15. Februar 2013) Die UNO hat 2013 als das Internationale Jahr der Quinoa bezeichnet und hat große Hoffnungen auf ihre Rolle im Kampf gegen den Welthunger. Die Ernte wird immer beliebter, mit Gesundheit Enthusiasten Heralding es als Super-Food aber die Frage nach dieser Popularität Auswirkungen auf Quinoa Züchter in den Anden ist auch aktuell und umstritten. Kritiker behaupten, dass die ansteigende Nachfrage nach dem Superkorn seinen Preis erhöht und es für arme Bolivianer unzugänglich macht, die sich stark auf Nährstoffe verlassen. Andere, auch die UNO, argumentieren, dass die Landwirte wirtschaftlich von der hohen Nachfrage nach der Ernte profitieren. In jedem Fall wird die Verantwortung auf den Verbraucher gelegt: den Verkauf zu boykottieren oder zu erhöhen. Dieser Artikel argumentiert, dass es nicht Konsumgewohnheiten, die das Leben der Landwirte beeinflussen, ist es eher das System hinter der Produktion, das wirklich nach Veränderung verlangt. Billige US-Weizenprodukte sättigen den bolivianischen Markt, untergraben den lokalen Lebensmittelmarkt und machen es schwierig für die lokalen Bauern zu konkurrieren. Darüber hinaus hat die Landwirtschaft der Ernte schädliche Auswirkungen auf das Land und die Ökosysteme, da die Regierung für die Mechanisierung des Produktionssystems drängt. (Häufige Träume) Die medizinische Zeitschrift The Lancet hat eine Reihe von Artikeln über nicht übertragbare Krankheiten und ihre Rolle in der Debatte nach dem Jahr 2015 veröffentlicht. Dieser Artikel betrachtet transnationale Nahrungsmittel und trinkt Korporationen als Treiber von NCDs. Sie untersucht ihr politisches Verhalten und wie sie arbeiten, um die Gesundheitsvorschriften zu untergraben und einen engen Vergleich mit der Tabak - und Alkoholindustrie zu verzeichnen. Jedes Jahr gibt es mehr als 9,4 Millionen Todesfälle durch hohen Blutdruck verursacht, 3,4 Millionen aus hohem Körper-Masse-Index und 2 Millionen aus hohem Cholesterin, von denen viele auf den Verbrauch von verarbeiteten Lebensmitteln und Getränke zugeschrieben werden könnte. Trotz dieser gesundheitlichen Gefahren haben transnationale Unternehmen wie Nestle und Coco-Cola einen großen Einfluss auf die öffentliche Politik, um NCDs zu bekämpfen und eine starke Position auf dem Weltmarkt zu haben, insbesondere in Ländern mit niedrigem und mittlerem Einkommen. Die Lancet NCD Aktionsgruppe fordert die Regierungen und die Zivilgesellschaft auf, die Gesundheit zu schützen und die Handlungen dieser Industrien zu regulieren. (The Lancet) Bhutan verbietet den Verkauf von Pestiziden und Herbiziden und die Förderung der traditionellen landwirtschaftlichen Methoden, um das weltweit erste völlig organische Land zu werden. Die Regierung hofft, dass diese Bewegung der Nation der Kleinbauern helfen wird, mehr Nahrung zu produzieren und die Exporte zu erhöhen. Das buddhistische Land ist führend in der nachhaltigen Entwicklung, es ist Kohlenstoff neutral, Lebensmittel sicher und 95 der Bevölkerung hat sauberes Wasser und Strom. Allerdings leidet es auch unter den Auswirkungen von Globalisierung, Konsum und Klimawandel. Viele Bhutaner zögern, einen landwirtschaftlichen Lebensunterhalt zu verfolgen und wandern in die Nachbarländer. Unvorhersehbares Wetter hat die Landwirte erntet und wachsende Zahlen haben sich auf Chemikalien verlassen, um ihre Erträge zu verbessern. Trotz dieser Rückschläge ist die Regierung zuversichtlich, dass es Bhutan gelingen wird, landwirtschaftlich organisch und als buddhistisches Land zu sein, sehen diesen Schritt sowohl praktisch als auch philosophisch wertvoll. (Guardian) Die Food and Drug Administration (FDA) hat Pläne, den AquAdvantage Lachs zu genehmigen, das erste gentechnisch veränderte Tier. Es wird durch die FDAs New Animal Drug Approval (NADA) ausgewertet, ein Verfahren zur Bewertung neuer Tierarzneimittel, nicht gentechnisch veränderter Tiere. Da ein Medikament in das einzellige Entwicklungsstadium eingeführt wird, wird das Tier als Arzneimittel betrachtet und ist daher nicht erforderlich, um in Bezug auf die menschliche Gesundheit, den Tierschutz oder die Umweltauswirkungen analysiert zu werden. Wenn diese Genehmigung vorangeht, wird der GE-Fleisch-Prozess wahrscheinlich von den Verbrauchern verborgen und als Freunde der Erdnoten, FDAs Genehmigung wird die Schleusen für andere gentechnisch veränderte Tiere, einschließlich Schweine und Kühe, öffnen, um die Nahrungsversorgung zu betreten. (US-amerikanische Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) hat einen Bericht veröffentlicht, der zeigt, dass zwischen 30 und 50 Prozent aller Lebensmittel auf der ganzen Welt produziert ist Jedes Jahr verschwendet. Diese globale Abfälle stammen vor allem aus Einzelhändlern und Konsumenten verlangen nach ästhetisch perfekten Lebensmitteln und strengen Sell-by-Daten. Die IMechE hat sich auch besorgt über das hohe Wasserniveau, das im Prozess der Nahrungsmittelproduktion verwendet wird, insbesondere bei der Herstellung von Fleisch. Wegen des hohen Ausmaßes des Aussehens werden etwa 550 Mrd. Kubikmeter Wasser in wachsenden Produkten verschwendet, die entsorgt werden, bevor sie sogar den Verbraucher erreichen. Da die Bevölkerung wächst und die Nahrungsmittelunsicherheit zunimmt, fordert die IMechE Regierungen, die Vereinten Nationen und Entwicklungsagenturen auf, dieses Problem anzugehen. (Guardian) In den letzten Jahren haben viele Entwicklungsorganisationen und NGOs die Verknüpfung großer Konzerne mit afrikanischen Kleinbauern gefördert. Kritiker wie Patrick Mulvany aus der UK Food Group argumentieren, dass diese Entwicklungen von Agrarunternehmen motiviert sind, die von der Einführung eines industrialisierten Agrarmodells in afrikanischen Ländern für ihren eigenen kommerziellen Erfolg abhängen. Große Landwirtschaftsfirmen wie Cargill und Monsanto bieten den Landwirten einen größeren Zugang zu Dünger, Qualitätssamen, Finanzen und anderen Diensten und schaffen damit eine Abhängigkeit, die letztlich Kleinbauern untergräbt. Agribusiness-Unternehmen sehen Kleinbauern als Chance, die Nahrungsmittelversorgung zu relativ günstigen Preisen zu sichern, indem sie billige Arbeitskräfte einsetzen und gleichzeitig einen neuen Markt für proprietäre Agrochemikalien schaffen. (Wächter) QampA: Nahrungsmittelproduktionskonten für 29 Prozent der Treibhausgase (31. Oktober 2012) Die Nahrungsmittelproduktion stellt 29 Prozent der Treibhausgase dar, die die globale Erwärmung verursachen. Zwei Berichte, die von der Beratenden Gruppe für internationale Agrarforschung (CGIAR) in Kopenhagen veröffentlicht wurden, bestätigten dies. Ein QampA mit den Autoren dieser Berichte ergab, dass der Emissions-Fußabdruck der Nahrungsmittelproduktion die kombinierten Emissionen aller Stufen der Nahrungsmittelproduktion (Herstellung von Inputs wie Düngemittel, Landwirtschaft selbst, Nahrungsmittelverteilung und - verkäufe sowie die Verwaltung von Nahrungsmittelabfällen) beinhaltet. Die Berichte betonen, dass die Auswirkungen des Klimawandels in Bezug auf die Ernährungssicherheit unverhältnismäßig auf die Menschen in den Entwicklungsländern fallen werden, auch wenn diese Menschen sehr wenig zur globalen Präsenz beitragen. Um Emissionen zu reduzieren, müssen neue Methoden der Nahrungsmittelproduktion sowie neue Lebensmittelverbrauchsmuster vorhanden sein. (IPS) Wetten auf dem Bauernhof: Africas Drive für Lebensmittel Selbstversorgung (19. Oktober 2012) Lebensmittelunsicherheit und Abhängigkeit von Lebensmittelimporten sind ein häufiges Problem in Afrika, trotz seiner reichlich vorhandenen Land und Ressourcen. Nach der Nahrungsmittelkrise von 2007-2008 haben eine Reihe von afrikanischen Ländern die Bemühungen zur Bewältigung dieses Problems und die Erreichung der Nahrungsmittel-Selbstversorgung auf der Grundlage der Grundsätze der nationalen und regionalen Ernährungssouveränität priorisiert. Das Herz dieser Strategien ist es, die Nahrungsmittelproduktion durch eine deutliche Verbesserung der Ernteerträge zu erhöhen und die aufstrebenden lokalen und regionalen afrikanischen städtischen Märkte zu betonen. Im Vergleich zu früheren Versuchen sind die Aussichten für die Afrikanische Ernährungssouveränität vielversprechender als zuvor, und es gibt einen wachsenden politischen Druck für Maßnahmen, die die Verbraucher vor Import und Preisvolatilität schützen. Allerdings sind erhebliche finanzielle Investitionen erforderlich, um über die politische Rhetorik hinauszugehen und die Abhängigkeit von externen Nahrungsmitteln zu verringern. (Think Africa Press) Wachsende Kulturen für Nahrung und Treibstoff gleichzeitig können arbeiten, aber Nahrungsmittelsicherheit muss eine Priorität sein. Der UN-Sonderberichterstatter für das Recht auf Nahrung Olivier De Schutter argumentiert, dass die EU-Pläne, ihre Biokraftstoff-Ziele nach unten zu überarbeiten, nicht weit genug gehen Die verbleibenden produktiven Länder stehen unter zunehmendem Druck für die Produktion von Biokraftstoffen. Der internationale Handel und die Investitionen in diesem Bereich verstärken dies. Die Senkung der Zielvorgaben für Biokraftstoffe ist unzureichend und eine Garantie für Nachhaltigkeit in der Landwirtschaft erfordert inländische Fall-für-Fall-Maßnahmen. De Shutter schlägt ein Modell vor, in dem Kleinbauern sich in Genossenschaften organisieren würden, die Biokraftstoff-Rohstoffe mit Heftklammern, die für lokale Lebensmittelmärkte vorgesehen waren, zusammenfuhren. Auf diese Weise würde die Produktion von Biokraftstoffen in der Tat kleinere lokale Nahrungsmittelproduzenten und Nahrungsmittelsysteme verstärken, die ein langfristiges Interesse an der Erhaltung der natürlichen Ressourcen haben. (Guardian) Über die Fischerei durch ausländische Flotten droht die Fischbestände für die lokalen Fischer in West - und Zentralafrika. Unregulierte Fischerei und schädliche Techniken zerstören die Lebensräume und verursachen die Ozeanbestände drastisch abbauen und sehen viele Arten zum Aussterben. Die Regionalkommission für Fischerei im Golf von Guinea (COREP) warnt davor, dass diese Belastung der Ressourcen die Ernährungssicherheit und den Lebensunterhalt in der Region bedroht. Die Regierungen müssen Maßnahmen zur Überwachung der Aktivitäten der ausländischen Fischereiflotten durchzusetzen. Warnungen sind jedoch abgelehnt, da die Behörden zögern, die Einnahmen, die sie vom Verkauf von Fischereirechten erhalten, zu verlassen. (Think Africa Press) Finanzspekulationen über Lebensmittelgüter bringt Unsicherheit und Volatilität auf die Märkte und ist eine große Bedrohung für die Welten arm. Das Institut für Internationale Finanzierung hat geschätzt, dass bis Mitte des vergangenen Jahres 450 Mrd. finanzielle Vermögenswerte in Rohstoffe oder Derivate investiert wurden, die auf zukünftige Kursbewegungen setzen. UNCTAD drängt die Regulierungsbehörden, eine Reihe von Maßnahmen zur Kontrolle und Begrenzung der Spekulationen zu ergreifen. Eine finanzielle Transaktionssteuer ist die wahrscheinlichste Maßnahme, um erfolgreich zu sein, da mindestens 11 europäische Länder in der Nähe der Annahme einer solchen Abgabe in naher Zukunft sind. Aber Lobbyarbeit durch Finanzunternehmen wird wahrscheinlich eine ernsthafte Regulierung von Futures und Derivaten verhindern. (Observer) Stanford Forscher zeigen Öl Palm Plantagen Clearing Kohlenstoff-reiche tropische Wälder in Borneo (8. Oktober 2012) Eine neue Studie von Stanford University Forscher zeigt, dass die expandierende Produktion von Palmöl zerstört tropischen Regenwälder in Borneo und deutlich erhöht Kohlendioxid Emissionen Indonesien ist der führende Produzent von Palmöl und Heimat der weltweit drittgrößten tropischen Waldgebiet. Wegen des schnellen Verlustes dieser Wälder ist Indonesien einer der weltweit größten Emittenten von Treibhausgasen. Trotz der Tatsache, dass rund 16 000 Quadratkilometer Waldflächen für Plantagen freigegeben wurden, ist eine genaue Information über diese Plantagen nicht leicht für die öffentliche Überprüfung oder Aufsicht verfügbar. Die meisten Bewohner in diesem Bereich sind sich dieser Entwicklungen nicht bewusst, die dramatische Auswirkungen auf ihren Lebensunterhalt und ihre Umwelt haben. (Farmland Grab) Was ist der echte Fahrer von High Food Preise und Hunger (6. September 2012) Die Medien Berichterstattung über die US-Dürre und Erhöhung der Lebensmittelpreise ist willkommen, aber es verewigt falsche Vorstellungen über die wichtigsten Ursachen und Lösungen für diese Probleme. Der Alternet-Artikel kritisiert die Berichterstattung, die Preiserhöhungen vor allem auf eine Zunahme der Fleisch-basierten westlichen Diäten in den Entwicklungsländern zurückführt. Während dies sicherlich ein Teil der Erklärung ist, verfehlt es zwei Probleme, die der Preisvolatilität zugrunde liegen - finanzielle Spekulationen und der Mangel an öffentlich gehaltenen Nahrungsmittelreserven. Es wird auch die Auswirkungen von Biokraftstoffen heruntergespielt. Während sich die Ernährungsmuster langsam ändern, kann der Einsatz von Biokraftstoffen durch Regierungspolitik schnell und entscheidend verändert werden. ( Alternet ) Food Shortages Could Force World into Vegetarianism, Warn Scientists (August 26, 2012) To avoid catastrophic food shortages in the next 40 years, the worlds rapidly growing population may have to switch almost completely to a vegetarian diet, says the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI). SIWIs latest report warns that there will not be enough water available for everyone to adopt a Western-type diet. Vegetarian diets consume five to ten times less water and would hence increase the amount of water available to grow more food. The International Water Management Institute (IWMI) also states that investment in small-scale water solutions rather than large irrigation projects would increase household revenues across the global south. ( Guardian ) Has Organic Been Oversized (July 7, 2012) In the past decade, US corporations such as Kellogg, PepsiCo and General Mills have bought many small, independent organic companies and profited from the value-added price of organic food, making it a 30-billion-a-year business. Their domination of the board that sets standards for organic foods has also led to an increase in the number of nonorganic materials approved for organic production, from 77 in 2002 to more than 250 today. By turning organic into a marketing ploy and corrupting the organic food industry, corporate giants continue to maintain the unsustainable food and farming system that threatens the health of humans and the environment. (New York Times) How Fairtrade Bananas are Failing Migrant Workers (May 28, 2012) In the Dominican Republic, the Fairtrade banana industry is reliant on Haitian migrant workers who are paid below living wages and have no access to social security. More than half of the countrys bananas are exported the UK, where supermarkets are the most powerful actors along the supply chain and make high profits based on unsustainably low prices that they pay to suppliers. While fair trade standards are designed to ensure that producers from developing countries have long-term security, in practice, the standards are not helping migrant workers to earn a fair salary and decent living conditions. (Guardian) In this article, author Eric Schlosser argues that the current system of food production must be overhauled in favor of a new diverse, resilient, and democratic system. Schlosser states that the current system is overly centralized, overly industrialized, and overly controlled by a handful of companies that are overly reliant on monocultures, pesticides, chemical fertilizers. He says that the current low costs of food are deceptive, but whats gone wrong in our food system can be reversed if we move towards alternative small scale production systems, such as organic farming. ( The Atlantic ) As consumer markets in the US and Western Europe are shriveling, Walmart. the worlds largest corporation, is attempting to enter markets of developing economies. It is estimated that the value of grocery markets in the four BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) will amount to three billion dollars in the next four years. With an 8 percent growth rate, India shines as a lucrative market for retailers. Walmarts entry into the country would not only jeopardize the livelihoods of small farmers but also destroy the entire Indian system of farm to table farming. It seems that Walmart poses a bigger threat to small-scale agriculture than seed titan Monsanto. (IPS Terraviva) Multi-national Biotech company Monsanto spent 2 million in the first quarter of 2009 lobbying the US government that genetically engineered seeds were safe and did not need testing. Leaked cables and internal FDA documents show that FDA scientists believe genetically modified foods could lead to new diseases. Although 30 countries have significant restrictions or bans on GMOs, the US government approves of their use. ( UK Progressive ) This new Global Citizens report on the state of GMOs highlights the false promises and failures of genetically engineered (GE) seeds. Contrary to claims by global corporation Monsanto, GE crops do not control pests and weeds, increase crop yields, or lower the levels of chemicals used in food production, writes activist Vandana Shiva. The report calls for a shift towards agroecology, a biological-based, sustainable alternative to the current industrial food production model. ( Panna ) In order to feed a growing global population, food output must compete with biofuels production and rise by seventy percent in the next forty years, says Policy advisor to Qatars food security program Mahendra Shah. According to Shah, biofuels encourage deforestation, increase fertilizer usage, and will inevitably lead to rising agricultural prices and push hundreds of millions of people into hunger. ( Bloomberg ) Preeminent land activist Vandana Shiva emphasizes the need to resist the agro-industrial takeover of small farmers and communities. This fundamental shift has played a significant role in denying millions of people their right to food. According to Shiva, it is important to move away from food dictatorship and build food democracies, which address the challenges of seed monopolies and advocate agroecology. (The Nation) This article discusses how sustainable intensificationthe production of food while reducing agricultures negative impacts on the environmentis a better alternative to GMO technology. Unlike GMO crops that rely on synthetic fertilizer and pesticides, sustainable farming increases the capture of carbon in the soil while simultaneously decreasing health risks from exposure to toxic chemicals. In this article Anna Lapp, co-founder of the Small Planet Institute, argues that GMOs do not strengthen social networks or up production significantly and they are not the answer to global food needs. (Civil Eats) During a campaign tour in the Midwest, Obama announced plans to spend up to 510m building biofuels refineries. These refineries will produce fuel from corn, wood chips, or grasses for the US navy and reduce Americas dependence on foreign oil, said Obama. Like corn ethanol, another government-backed biofuel, investment in these types of biofuels could further constrict food supplies and hike global food prices, as seen with corn ethanol. ( Guardian ) US farmers have begun growing Enogen-branded genetically modified (GM) corn plants to produce ethanol for commercial purposes. Critics of Enogen believe farmers will be drawn to the new efficient ethanol form of corn and consequently produce less food for human consumption. Studies show a well-established relationship between expanding biofuels production and rising global food prices. There is also much worldwide resistance to the introduction of this new GM corn. The EU, South Korea, and South Africa have not approved the import of the new GM corn and food industry groups in the US also oppose the new Enogen corn, citing cross-pollination fears. ( Guardian ) In an effort to foster trade and boost exports, Russia is looking to sell about 24 million hectares of arable land, below-market price, to Asian countries seeking to invest in foreign farmland for food security purposes. Currently, a reported 409 million acres of farmland are unused in Russia. The Russian government plans to acquire more land for lending, by annulling ownership rights to land that has not been cultivated for three years. Russias focus on Southeast Asia is part of a wider effort to build stronger ties with the fastest growing region in the world. ( Bloomberg ) The neglect of sustainable agriculture in Africa must end says Kanayo Nwaze, president of the UNs International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The Somali famine serves as a warning to African governments and the international community to invest in small-scale farming. Development assistance for agriculture fell from 20billion (in the 1990s) to 3billion (in the early 2000s) due to an emphasis shift from agriculture to industrialization. Agriculture accounts for approximately 30 of sub-Saharan Africas GPD but represents 80 of export earnings in other countries. Nwaze is confident that diversification, rural investment, the stemming of migration, and reduction in the gap between rural and the urban populations can boost food productivity and generate income for countries in Africa. ( Guardian ) This article from Nourishing the Planet, a project of the Worldwatch Institute, identifies inefficiencies within the current food system and outlines ways in which producers and consumers can work together to increase food security. Recommendations include using low-cost technology, such as cell phones, to give farmers direct access to market information and ensure fair pricing. Such practices will increase market transparency and allow for the fair distribution of food, says Nourishing the Planet. With a growing global population, it is important to address problems in the current food system, rather than only channeling efforts into producing more crops. ( Worldwatch Institute ) The European Unions (EU) reform of its Common Agricultural Policy does not include any change for subsidies to EU agricultural producers. The EU argues at the World Trade Organization that its supports are no longer trade distorting, since they are not tied to farmers production. According to this analytical note, these distortions have far-reaching implications for developing countries, including impacts on small farmers. The EUs developing country partners negotiating trade agreements should protect themselves against EU-created distortions in agricultural trade. (South Centre) Chinas increasing domestic demand for food could mean a rise in imports of key grains to feed its growing population. China is usually a large net exporter of grains like corn, rice and wheat, so an increase in imports may affect the price of food commodities worldwide. As Chinas population becomes wealthier, dietary changes include more meat consumption. According to the Chinese director of the State Councils office on rural policy, decision-makers should rethink the notion of food self-sufficiency. (Wall Street Journal) Industrial agriculture methods, involving the intensive use of energy, water, machinery, and chemicals to grow crops, cannot be relied upon to feed people in the future. The UN Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier de Schutter says that the combination of agronomics and ecological science, known as Agroecology, best suits the needs of the 21st century. De Schutter believes that resource efficiency should be the prime objective - saving water, preserving soil, and de-linking agriculture from fossil energies. (AlterNet) The EUs Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) that subsidizes European farmers is notable because of the harm it causes to producers in the developing world. Now, Eastern European farmers, who do not receive high subsidies as their Western European counterparts, are lobbying for reform to make arrangements more equitable. This article highlights the many failings of the CAP, and advocates for changing the system. However, this seems improbable at the present. ( Langlophone ) Global wheat prices have doubled in the past two years due to a combination of factors, including changing weather and grain commodity speculation. Financial market mechanisms create perverse incentives resulting in farmers planting other crops such as soy and cotton chasing higher returns. In order to avoid such problems, governments should better regulate food commodities, particularity grains and cereals. This article analyses the causes of the decline in global stockpiles, such as export bans on farmers in Russia, crop production and increasing food prices resulting in riots. (Bloomberg) According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, bees pollinate around 71 of the 100 crop species which provide 90 per cent of food worldwide. But bees are dying out rapidly. A new report by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) says that toxic chemicals in pesticides cause a loss in the sense of direction and memory for bees, which they rely on to find food. UNEP advises farmers to take more care when applying insecticides and other chemicals, and restore bee-friendly habitats. (The Australian) Fishermen discard more than 10 per cent of all the fish caught for human consumption. As much as two-thirds of the fish caught in some areas ends up back into the water, usually dead, due to the current EU system of fishing quotas. EU Ministers plan to make the most radical change to fisheries policy in 40 years. A common fisheries policy, reform fishing quotas, means that fishermen do not need to throw away large amounts of their catch. (Guardian) Chinas approach to food security as national security can offer important lessons for the rest of the world. A policy of maintaining an emergency grain reserve means that China does not play a significant role in global grain markets, despite being the worlds largest wheat producer. China also stores foods like pork and edible oils. Many other nations do not follow the same approach. This article argues that given the current volatility of the global food system, more countries should look into the idea of food reserves to feed their own populations. (Foreign Policy In Focus) Humans have caught and consumed over 65 per cent of all large fish species in the last 100 years. Experts say that this ecological imbalance will forever change the oceans, with only small fish such as sardines and anchovies thriving in future decades. Overfishing in East Asia is problematic since almost 50 percent of the increase in the worlds fish consumption for food comes from that region. The UN Environment program says international organizations and governments should regulate number of fishing boats and the days they fish in order to stabilize fish populations. (The Washington Post) Chinas major agricultural regions are affected by the worst drought in 60 years, threatening crop production and drinking water supplies. Any decision by its government to import large quantities of food will further increase high food prices. The International Rice Research Institute says that the countrys grain situation is critical to the entire world. China produces more wheat than any other nation, and is the worlds largest importer of soybeans, making them very important to the world food market. (New York Times) NATO and foreign governments have spent 200 million to flight piracy off the coast of Somalia, but they have failed to address the plundering of Somalias fisheries by Asian and European fishing fleets. The rapid growth of piracy is linked to the destruction of Somalis local fishing sector. According to the High Seas Taskforce, these illegal fleets break international conventions, destroy marine stocks and deny some of the worlds poorest people their source of protein and livelihoods. (The Africa Report) Developing countries are taking action against rising food prices, including price caps and export bans. Many governments are concerned that speculation on food prices will cause another political crisis, similar to the violent riots in 2008. Indonesia is removing import tariffs on over 50 items including wheat, soybeans, fertilizer and animal feed. India is extending the ban on the export of lentils and cooking oil. The UN and World Bank advise governments to invest more in new production and agricultural infrastructure to match the rising demand for food. (Wall Street Journal) In India, two fifths of the population is hungry and 75 per cent of Indians lack adequate food and nutrition. At the same time tones of stored grain decay in warehouses. The government of India is unwilling to reform the system of food distribution to feed hungry people. This article examines the option of an equity-based social framework where agriculture and natural resources are paramount. A legal guarantee through a universal regime of food security is needed to feed hungry people and eradicate poverty in India. (South Asian Citizens Web) The Foresight Report on Food and Farming Futures, a study into food security commissioned by the UK government, says that the current world trade and food production system is unsustainable and fails to end hunger. The report recommends the minimization of waste, as well as the sustainable production of food in order for the system to provide good health and nutrition to a growing world population. The report also calls for government intervention to protect poor people from sharp price increases. (BBC) An extra 75 million people are malnourished due to recent food price rises. But real supply and demand do not determine prices, instead banks, hedge funds and financiers are making billions of dollars by speculating on food. Staple foods as well as cocoa, fruit juices, sugar, meat and coffee are all now global commodities, along with oil, gold and metals. Olivier de Schutter, UN Rapporteur on the Right to Food, has no doubt that speculators are a major cause of rising prices. ( Guardian) The US Agriculture Department reduced its estimates for global harvests of key crops, including corn and soy beans, due to tightening food supplies and rising food prices. Supply constraints reflect the dry weather in South America and Russia and floods in Australia. Another problem is the use of crops by the biofuel industry, which in the US enjoys extensive government incentives. A rising population is putting unsustainable pressures on resources such as water, food and energy, which could cause social and political instability and irreparable environmental damage. (Wall Stret Journal) Agribusiness companies in the US are recipients of federal farm subsidies that impact the world economy and the environment. This article examines the influence of the US Farm Lobby on Washingtons foreign policy. US farmers export goods like cigarettes and pop corn to blacklisted countries under the guise of humanitarian aid through legal loopholes. Agricultural protectionism by the US is not only detrimental to foreign policy, but also threatens the world trade and food production system. (Foreign Policy In Focus) The price of sugar, grain and oilseed drove world food prices to a record high in December 2010. It is the sixth consecutive month in which the UN food price index has risen. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization warn that prices could rise even higher given the droughts in Argentina and floods in Australia affecting crop yields and commodity prices. Grain prices impact significantly on the food budgets of people in poor countries. An increase in food prices would almost certainly increase world hunger and set off another global food crisis. (New York Times) UK agriculture and environment minister, Caroline Spelman, recently chastised EU governments for their Common Agriculture Policy (CAP), because of its enormous cost in a time when government finances are looking wobbly. Spelman proposes to replace direct subsidies with income supports tied to enhanced environmental protection. Farm subsidies in the worlds advanced economies are inherently unequal, and when viewed within the broader context of rising food prices, climate change, and increasing protectionism, it is clear that the current system urgently needs modification. ( Reuters ) The bumblebee is an important pollinator of many agricultural crops around the world, including most fruits, vegetable and nuts as well as coffee, soya beans and cotton. Ninety per cent of the worlds commercial plants are dependent on pollination by bees to increase yield. These insects, along with other pollinators, have been in serious decline in the last few decades. There is concern about the impact this could have on global food production. UN conservation strategies may help to mitigate further losses. (Guardian) The fisheries sector plays a critical role in reducing poverty, hunger and malnutrition for many developing countries. Coastal states particularly should ensure regional collaboration on shared fish stocks. Recent statistics indicate that fish stocks are continuing to declining due to over-fishing, poaching by unlicensed vessels and illegal fishing. The Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, regional fisheries bodies and others are working on conservation and protect. (Today) Myanmar is the second largest opium poppy grower in the world, after Afghanistan. Conflict in the north and growing food insecurity is resulting in small-scale farmers growing poppy in order to feed their families. According to this report, 77 of the 1.2 million farmers growing poppy are doing so to pay for food. The production of these drugs is mostly for export within the region and internationally. Without more attention to the human and food insecurity problem, convincing farmers to stop the production of such a lucrative drug will be difficult. (IRIN) Small farmers and local food producers all around the world often find themselves driven off their land. When governments do not invest enough in local agriculture, these farmers are left vulnerable and impoverished. UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier de Schutter says that the most sustainable solution for developing countries is to reinvest in domestic agriculture to feed their own populations. These countries should also diversify their economies in order to decrease dependency on a limited range of export crops. (IPS) The International Fund for Agriculture and Development (IFAD) have released a report on volatile food prices, the effects of climate change and a range of natural resource constraints which complicate the fight to end rural poverty. IFAD says that food production will have to increase by 70 per cent to feed the expected world population of 9 billion by 2050. Rural poverty rates have dropped over the last decade. However the situation for women farmers has not improved. Women still face limited access to land tenure, credit and equipment, and market opportunities. (IPS) The prices of wheat, maize and other traded foods have risen by up to 40 percent in a few months. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, the food import bills for the worlds poorest countries are predicted to rise 11 percent in 2010 and by 20 percent for low-income food-deficit countries. The food prices would then reach a level not seen since the food crisis in 2008. The price inflation is partly fuelled by food commodity speculation. Legal regulations that control global food speculation are needed before to avoid a repetition of the 2008 crisis and millions of more hungry people. ( Guardian) FAO estimates that 925 million of the worlds people are undernourished. Because of the rising US corn price, that number could now grow higher. Even the smallest increase in bushel prices for corn, grain or wheat can have a devastating impact on food availability for millions of people. A weakened dollar has led to rising speculation in the commodity market and increased price volatility, while climate change is diminishing production. Experts fear another global food crisis. (Countercurrents) Structural barriers to sustainable development are woven in the malfunctioning neoliberal economic policies. For issues like food security, poverty eradication and reaching a sustainable environment, governments have to think outside the neoliberal box. Neoliberal institutions like the G20 are not looking to help developing countries to become food secure. Instead, developing countries are increasingly dependent on food imports, and the G20 chooses to look the other way since they dont want to hurt the commercial interests of corporate agricultural giants. In this interview, Devinder Sharma explains. (Share the Worlds Resources) Western lifestyle often literally means taking food from poor people - the harsh truth is the hunger of the poor is in part a choice of the rich. Putting limits on food speculation, making cut-backs to the global food trade and assisting poor nations in creating food sovereignty are some of the things that have to be made if hunger is ever going to be defeated. The cause of hunger is not so much about a lack of food as unfair allocations of the worlds resources. Acknowledging self-sufficiency is critical and by growing our own food, the power of corporate agriculture will be undermined. (Share the Worlds Resources) About 7 million people in Afghanistan, over 24 percent of the countrys population, are food insecure. Afghanistan is largely a food deficit country. But wheat although considered a strategic crop and staple food - is not encouraged by the Afghan Ministry of Agriculture. Instead, it promotes export crops like fruit and saffron because they receive a higher price in international markets. Donors such as USAID condone this trade-oriented food production strategy while Afghani people rely on food aid. This is just one example of the distorted global food system that continues to burden people worldwide. ( IRIN ) Bill Clintons Doubletalk on Haitian Agriculture (May 17, 2010) Bill Clinton has admitted that the US free-market agriculture policy towards Haiti did not work. But the solutions Clinton puts forward, as the UN Special Envoy to Haiti, calls for more of the same failed policies. Clintons presidential policies toward Haiti deliberately reconfigured the country to fit into the new global division of labor, turning relatively self-sufficient farmers into low-wage workers in assembly plants. Now, Clinton ignores practical ideas put forward by Haitian popular organizations, while the ex-president continues to bolster export-oriented cash crops like coffee, mangos, and avocados. ( NACLA ) Liberias agricultural sector has been suffering from underdevelopment due to fourteen years of civil war. The Liberian government is now investing in its farmers and creating a long-term plan to counter the stagnation. The governments main priority is food security and decreasing the countrys dependence on food imports. In conjunction with the United Nations, the Liberian government developed a food and nutrition program that calls for investing in the countrys infrastructure so that Liberian farmers are able to increase food production for national consumption. ( Reuters AlertNet ) Cuba will bring farming to the suburban areas around cities and towns, providing the science and leadership for alternative, localized models of food production. This approach brings food production closer to the urban areas where 76 percent of the islands population lives. The approach, which will not only provide food but also cultivate carbon sinks, create water basins, and reduce emissions, is based on principles of crop diversity and the use of animals for traction and transport of produce.( IPS ) 100 billion a year in US and EU farm subsidies are distorting world trade and harming exporters in poor countries. This article asks if the global financial crisis presents an opportunity to get rid of these astounding distortions. Many lobbyists and politicians in high income countries obstruct efforts to reform these policies that devastate poor countries. ( Africa Report ) Cheap food causes poverty and hunger. This article explains the contradictory nature of food and agriculture under globalization. The demand for low food prices means many farmers are getting less money for their crops and struggle to support themselves. As farmers go out of business, long term food security is also at risk. The author blames the demand for cheapness for the food crisis, concluding that there are some essential things, such as our land and the life-sustaining foods it can produce, that should not be cheapened. ( Resurgence ) The worlds largest agribusiness companies squeeze the agriculture system from both the supply and demand side, threatening food security. Seed prices overall have risen 146 percent in the last decade as many farmers in the US and worldwide have no choice but to buy seeds from Monsanto, the worlds largest GM seed company. As well, agribusiness mergers in the last two decades have concentrated the industrys buying power in the hands of a small number of corporations, threatening farmers to get big, or get out. ( Triple Crisis ) Colonialism Lives In Biotech Seed Proposal for Africa (March 20, 2010) Biotechnology is playing an increasing role in African agriculture. As a result, farmers are becoming more dependent on imported technology - a fact that hinders local sustainability. US companies, Monsanto and Pioneer, plan to export more biotech corn seed to Africa - claiming yields will increase to provide more food and profit for all. However, companies sell seed at a great cost to farmers and enforce strict rules to prohibit sowed seeds being used for future seasons. Moreover, the agricultural methods promoted are designed for monoculture production on large scale acreages (like in the US) and are unsuited to the small scale production methods of African farming. (Institute for Agriculture and Trade) Large Agribusiness Hurting Small Landholders, says UN Rights Expert (March 5, 2010) The global food sector is dominated by transnational corporations and as a result small landowners and farmers are suffering, says Olivier de Schutter, UN Special Rappotteur on the Right to Food. De Schutter says that smallholders in developing countries are suffering hunger and poverty because of the tremendous market influence of the companies. He proposes that governments use tax incentives, legal protection of rights of agricultural workers, and action against foreign suppliers that abuse the rights of local producers. (UN News Centre) Reclaiming Rice From Rats and Rot (January 14, 2010) Experts estimate that in 2009 Liberia lost up to 60 of its harvest due to vermin infestation and poor weather conditions. Resultantly food insecurity has increased. In response, UN officials are calling for donors to invest in pest control and food storage systems. Likewise, FAO and the Liberian Agriculture Ministry have recognized the problem and set up field schools to train farmers how to protect their crops from pests. (IRIN) Rwanda has recorded a sharp increase in food productivity. In 2009, the Government invested in fertilizer distribution, improving seed stocks and crop husbandry training. Together these investmentshave boosted the output of major food crops such as maize, potatoes, cassava and rice. Rwanda now has sufficient food reserves to meet domestic demands for eight months. (IRIN) This report by Oxfam International advocates for building up the resilience of vulnerable farm operations. Building up such resilience not only depends on helping farmers to best manage their resources, but also on collaboration of local, national and global institutions. The report underlines the importance of farmer-driven decisions as well as gender-based policies that aim to meet the specific needs of women farmers. (Oxfam) In Rome, the World Summit on Food Security has attracted only few leaders of rich countries. The summit reveals the wide gap between the rich and the poor countries agriculture and trade policy. In addition, the summit has failed to fulfill expectations on aid and agriculture assistance. Change seems far away and leaders have expressed their concern that the conference will produce little of substance. ( New York Times ) In 2008, food prices reached historically high levels, leaving millions of additional people in hunger. Policy makers and civil society have called for public food reserves in order to stabilize prices and mitigate the food emergency. International agricultural and trade policy have led to price instability, with devastating effects on developing countries. This paper calls for a discussion in which food reserves form part of a reformed trade system. ( Share the Worlds Resources ) Industrial agriculture plays a key role in the climate crisis. Agro industry heavily uses fertilizer, pesticides and herbicides, which damage natural soil fertility. According to this report from GRAIN, agro industry depletes soil, which results in up to two third of the excess carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere. GRAIN sharply criticizes this highly concentrated food system and calls for a fundamental policy change and the return to small-scale and ecologically friendly farming. ( GRAIN ) Africa and Global Food Crisis (September 3, 2009) In this interview with Afroline, Olivier de Schutter, a UN special rapporteur, clarifies different aspects of the African food crisis. De Schutter puts the emphasis on discrimination and marginalization rather than imbalance of supply and demand, to explain the current hunger problem in Africa. The UN rapporteur touches also the controversial issue of land grabbing, as oil-rich countries buy lands in poor countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America. (Pambazuka) Food production and energy consumption are closely interlinked. Due to the heavy use of fertilizer, the agriculture industry depends more than ever on energy inputs. The long-term trend of high energy prices threatens the food system. The environmental movement favors a return to local and organic farming in order to close the inflationary price gap. ( CIBC World Markets ) The EU promotes the worlds biggest agricultural aid program and spends almost 53 billion in subsidies - half of its annual budget. Non-traditional farming companies receive an important share of the aid, which contradicts the original idea of production incentives and price support. Further, farmland ownership already entitles landlords to subsidies regardless of agricultural use. The Queen of England and airport caterers are among recipients of this giant subsidy system. ( NY Times ) Experts claim that the industrial food system and the factory farm model lie at the roots of the Mexican borne swine flu. For years, public authorities have ignored early warning signs about the overcrowded and unsanitary conditions of intensive meat production and have instead supported corporate cover-ups. Pharmaceutical companies and vaccine producers reap the benefits from the swine epidemic and public authorities continue to prioritize the interests of large corporations instead of the health of local communities. ( GRAIN ) Following the military intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) developed agricultural reconstruction programs, aimed at helping farmers rebuild their agricultural activities and providing alternatives to the cultivation of opium. However, these agricultural reconstruction programs legitimize the US military occupation and enable foreign seed companies and agribusiness to establish their presence in a potentially lucrative market. The symbiotic work between US military and agribusiness jeopardizes Afghan farmers livelihoods and gives a monopoly to US companies over seed supply to Afghanistan. After the complete withdrawal of combat troops, the remaining military forces will serve as aid workers to safeguard US military power in Afghanistan and Iraq and protect US corporate interests. ( GRAIN ) African farmers, researchers and civil society speak out against Western-led campaigns which champion genetically engineered (GE) crops as a solution to world hunger. Compiling experiences and voices from African opposition, this report challenges the Gates Foundations Alliance for a New Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA). The document complements a UN Environmental Programme (UNEP) report, which reveals the likelihood of biotech solutions deepening, rather than solving hunger problems. As the West exploits the food crisis as an opportunity to promote GM crops, Voices from Africa urges Africa to resist bullying tactics that force the continent to adopt biotechnology solutions. Instead, the report emphasizes investment in small-scale agriculture, which will enable farmers to take control over food production.( Oakland Institute ) Even mainstream economists acknowledge that speculation in commodity markets contributed to the rise in food prices in 20072008, which pushed millions more people into hunger. After the subprime mortgage bubble burst and stocks began to fall in the US, institutional investors sought new high-return bets for their money, moving onto speculation in commodity markets. This distorted the price of food staples such as rice and contributed to rapidly rising food prices. To avoid such speculation in the future, the author recommends a food trade register at the commodity exchanges and corresponding regulation of commercial traders. ( World Economy, Ecology and Development ) A new study produced by the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP), entitled The Environmental Food Crisis, warns that unless the global systems of agricultural production undergo radical change, millions more will go hungry. Demonstrating the success of organic agricultural models, UNEP Executive Director states that future agricultural production must adopt methods that increase crop yields without creating the environmental and social damage that resulted from industrial agricultural production. Agro-businesses tread carefully ( Inter Press Service ) Monsanto hails its genetically engineered drought-tolerant corn as a solution to food security in the face of global warming. But research findings reveal the flaws of genetically engineered crops, which suffer yield losses under the erratic weather patterns caused by climate change. This article argues that agricultural policy must prioritize needs of food-insecure famers, not profit-driven agribusinesses. Organic farming practices require fewer energy inputs and withstand impacts like drought more efficiently. Organic farming offers smallholder farmers a more accessible and affordable option to exorbitantly priced GM crops. ( Grist ) This article urges for a farm bill that addresses the problems of industrialized agriculture, which has lead to soil loss, pollution, the destruction of rural communities and made our food supply dependent on fossil fuels. The authors argue that a national agricultural policy based on ecological principles is needed in order to keep up production and to preserve the land. The proposals to protect the soil and to reduce greenhouse gases include increasing the mixture of grain-bearing perennials and using crop rotations, which would simultaneously increase employment opportunities in agriculture. ( New York Times ) Agriculture is multifunctional with commodity and non-commodity outputs. The International Assessment of Agriculture Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) has released a benchmark report. This assessment addresses the challenges to increase agricultural productivity on a sustainable base and to create opportunities for small-scale farms. It takes into account the multiple dimensions of agriculture and emphasizes the need to incorporate agricultural knowledge, science and technology in order to fight hunger and poverty. ( IAASTD ) Speculation on agricultural commodities increases food prices and undermines food security for low-income countries, where people generally spend about 60-80 percent of their income on food. This report argues that governments worldwide should register speculators in a trade register to control trade and prevent speculation on food commodities. ( Eurodad ) This working paper for the International Follow-Up Conference in Doha November 2008, proposes a new financial architecture including a special tax on capital assets and improved supervision of investors. The paper describes the current financial system as a casino economy, based on competition, speculation and pursuit of profit, which contributes to increasing food prices and makes the poor pay the costs of the global financial crisis. ( Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst ) This report outlines the root causes of the global food crisis and addresses problems, such as trade conditions, biofuel production and financial speculation. Further, the report points out that many people participate in riots against the conditions of the global food system. ( Institute for Food and Development Policy ) Sudan, a country that receives a billion pounds of food from international donors, is exporting its own crops and capitalizing on high global food prices. Government officials argue that building up the agricultural sector will diversify Sudans economy and make the country self-sufficient. However, millions are starving in the conflict-ridden region of Darfur as international aid agencies struggle to deliver food. The Sudanese government continues to disrupt efforts of aid agencies to feed the people in Darfur at a time when international organizations lack adequate funds to purchase and deliver food. ( New York Times ) Conventional economists argue that everyone will benefit if countries specialize in producing a few different food commodities and import the rest. But without any protection of the domestic market, farmers in poorer countries must compete with commodities subsidized by richer countries. As over 29 countries have restricted food exports to ensure that their people have enough to eat, the import-dependent countries have even less access to food. A group of food-importing countries is promoting an agreement in the Doha Development Round to prevent countries from unilaterally restricting exports. ( New York Times ) People are protesting the soaring prices of oil and food throughout Asia. In Vietnam, low-wage factory workers are on strike against the 70 percent increase in food prices since 2007 that has in turn led to a 25 percent inflation rate. Policymakers across Asia are responding to social discontent by raising interest rates to curb high inflation, says Christian Science Monitor . However, Asian governments are facing a dilemma - they must raise interest rates without undermining growth because their popularity is contingent upon a booming economy. The World Food Summit declaration neglects to address the root causes of global food insecurity. World leaders failed to reach a solution on biofuel production, even though the International Food Policy Research Institute calculated that production of biofuel is responsible for 30 of the rise in food prices. Furthermore, the declaration urged governments to reduce trade restrictions, even though trade liberalization is one of the main causes of the food crisis. ( OpenDemocracy ) Director General of the World Trade Organization Pascal Lamy claims that liberalizing trade will strengthen the production capacity of developing countries and render food prices less vulnerable to change. But, the author fears that further deregulation of trade will make food prices more volatile and allow large multinational companies to undermine local production in poor countries. Finding a sustainable solution will require world leaders to increase investment in agriculture and support small-scale farmers agro-ecological methods. (Inter Press Service) This Foreign Policy In Focus article argues that the shift of countries from net-exporters to net-importers of food caused the global food crisis. The author criticizes the IMF and World Banks structural adjustment programs that lowered countries investments and social spending. Several poor countries dedicated land for export crops to service their debt to the World Bank and IMF. As a result, food production has declined and food insecurity has grown. For example, from 1966-70, Africa exported an average 1.3 million tons of food a year but almost all African countries are now net food importers. At the UN Food Summit in Rome, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon made several short - and long-term recommendations to address the food crisis. Although he recommended implementing social protection programs and supporting smallholder farming, Ban also endorsed more controversial measures such as a Green Revolution in Africa and minimizing trade restrictions. Despite widespread criticism of biofuels, the Secretary General neglected to acknowledge how biofuel production leads to food shortages. ( UN News ) The 2008 global food crisis demonstrates the destructiveness of the one-two punch of IMF-imposed adjustment and WTO-imposed trade liberalization. These policies have steadily marginalized farmers, and transformed self-sufficient agricultural economies into vulnerable, import-dependent ones. Large industrial farms and grain-trading corporations control the global food market. However, poor countries increasingly defy World Bank, IMF and WTO policies with fruitful results and farmers movements such as the Via Campesina are gaining in influence. ( The Nation ) Economists argue that increased speculation in agricultural commodities is pushing up food prices, a phenomenon termed as agflation. But, others argue that agro-prices are still recovering from their dramatic decrease of the 1980s. The price of corn, for example, is still below the 1945-1980 average. Although analysts have differing theories, the author concludes that speculation is one of the many causes of the global food crisis. ( World Economy and Development in Brief ) In this interview, physicist Vandana Shiva explains that the global economic structure is incompatible with the basic physics of the planet. Unsustainable, large-scale agriculture not only displaces small peasants, creates poverty and bad food, but also emits a huge quantity of carbon into the atmosphere, causing climate instability. Perversely, large agribusinesses with a stranglehold of the world economy, such as Cargill and Monsanto, harvest super-profits while people starve. ( AlterNet ) Raj Patel, author of the book Stuffed and Starved: The Hidden Battle for the World Food System, wants consumers to stop feeling guilty about eating unhealthy foods. Instead, consumers should get angry at the food corporations that have chipped away at their ability to choose, leaving low-income families with the so-called choice between Burger King and MacDonalds, and between Pepsi and Coke. Patel argues that major food producers have spent millions on research and marketing to convince their customers to eat unhealthy food that only benefits the corporations. ( AlterNet ) This article criticizes the effect of industrial agriculture on global food security. The author points out that a few large corporations have patented or genetically modified most of the plants humans rely on for their basic needs. These corporations use chemical and genetic technologies to dominate agricultural production from seed to stomach and to profit from every bite. In addition, industrial food production exhausts Earths basic biological support systems, and makes the planet more vulnerable to climate change. ( AlterNet ) Some world leaders argue that the WTO Doha Round will solve the global food crisis. But, this Institute for Agricultural and Trade Policy (IATP) article says increased trade liberalization will reinforce poorer countries dependence on food imports. Further, deregulation policies will increase the power of transnational agribusinesses at the expense of local farmers. Instead, the IATP argues, world leaders should reform the rules governing international trade to control the market power exerted by agribusiness companies. Cargill is one of a handful of corporations that control the global system of food production and agriculture. By selling farmers agricultural input, and then buying outputs for further processing, Cargill has created a worldwide agricultural system in which it is both buyer and seller and has near unlimited freedom to maximize profit. In this report, Food amp Water Watch warns that Cargills enormous and under-regulated influence on global agricultural trade threatens the health of consumers, family farmers, the environment and even entire economies and governments. Since the 1970s, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund pushed for large-scale industrial agriculture, trade liberalization and other structural adjustment policies in poor countries, causing the structural meltdown that led to the global food crisis. The global market system which puts the needs of investors before the nutritional needs of humans has transformed food from nourishment into a commodity for speculation and bargaining. Nearly all corporate players in the global food chain reported record profits after the first quarter of 2008. These corporations are making a killing from the food crisis. ( GRAIN ) An international research project consisting of 900 representatives from multilateral organizations, civil society, national governments, the private sector and scientific institutions has produced a report that evaluates the relevance, quality and effectiveness of agricultural knowledge, science and technology (AKST) on development. This summary of the International Assessment on Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) report concludes that small-scale farmers and their traditional agricultural knowledge should play a greater role in production. Also, the report criticizes genetic modification (GM) in agriculture, pointing out that research on long-term effects of GM is lagging behind. The study warns that patenting genetic modifications undermines local farming practices and concentrates the ownership of resources. ( GreenFacts ) Hungry people are protesting around the globe as they struggle to feed themselves in the face of massive commodity price rises. Large agribusinesses claim they are working to solve the food crisis. Monsanto plans to design genetically modified crops that can squeeze even more yield from each acre of planted grain. But Big Agriculture actually benefits from the food crisis. Monsantos profit in the last quarter (February 2008) more than doubled, while Cargills profit jumped 42 percent in the same period. ( Wall Street Journal ) European subsidies for agriculture are contributing to rapidly rising food prices and the destruction of small-scale farming. These massive subsidies artificially cheapen EU products, making it impossible for small-scale farmers in poorer countries to compete. Critics have long protested the way in which these subsidies distort global agriculture and trade. In light of the 2008 food crisis, the EU subsidies are under heavy fire, from poor countries who suffer most, but also from within, by EU politicians and policymakers. ( Inter Press Service ) In the first half of 2008, the price of rice more than doubled, making it unaffordable for many Liberians, who have switched from rice to cheaper staple foods like spaghetti. Liberia depends almost completely on foreign imports of rice from the US and Asia. While the Liberian Minister for Agriculture optimistically notes that this might be an opportunity for Liberians to diversify their diets, this example shows how vulnerable poor, net food importing countries are to price shocks on the global market. (BBC) Korean authorities have found bone fragments even an entire spine - in shipments of US beef. Consequently, South Korea banned the import of US beef, as it did not comply with Korean food safety standards. This article reports on how the US uses Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations to force South Korea to remove the ban on US beef and relax food safety standards. Besides the health risk involved, domestic farmers get pushed off the market by subsidized US imports. The author concludes that FTAs pressure weaker nations into relinquishing their food sovereignty, their control of national food safety and their right to reject genetically modified products. ( Foreign Policy in Focus ) Biofuel production and livestock are important causes of the global food crisis. Both divert huge amounts of grain away from human mouths: 100 million and 760 million tons, respectively. The author states that consumers should eat as little meat as possible. The author concludes that it seems surreal that while half the world might not have anything to eat at all, those in rich countries have endless choices and barely notice the global food crisis. It is hard to understand how two such different food economies could occupy the same planet, until you realize that they feed off each other. ( AlterNet ) This article is highly critical of World Bank president Robert Zoellicks calls for further trade liberalization as a response to the global food crisis. According to the author, trade liberalization is not the solution but the cause of the food crisis. The 2007-2008 food price rises have had such a severe effect on the worlds poor because of the trade liberalization the World Bank, World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund propagate. These policies limit social safety nets and public sector agricultural support, push small-scale farmers out of the market, and lead to the sale of grain stockpiles to service foreign debt. Consequently, there is no buffer between price shocks and the bellies of the poorest people on earth. ( Guardian ) This Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy report argues that while high commodity prices such as those of 2007 and 2008 can potentially benefit farmers, this is not the case in the short-term. The immediate effects of high food prices are to place extreme stress on the urban and rural poor of net-food importing, low-income countries. The IATP urges trade ministers at the UN Conference on Trade and Development in Accra, 2008 (UNCTAD XII) to review three decades of commodity market liberalization critically and to take action to rebalance power relations in agricultural markets. Joachim von Braun, director general of the International Food Policy Research Institute . calls for policy action in three areas to address the massive rise in food prices. Firstly, he proposes the implementation of social safety nets to help the poor who can no longer afford essential foodstuffs. Secondly, he calls for increased investment in agriculture. Finally, stating that export restrictions and import subsidies only add to global trade distortions that harm poor countries, he calls for other trade policy reforms, such as the removal of trade barriers by rich countries. This article analyzes the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), an initiative by the Bill amp Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. AGRA aims to end poverty and hunger by restructuring Africas food systems. But, this reform may ultimately serve the interests of agribusinesses like Monsanto, by creating a new market for genetically modified seeds and agrochemicals. AGRAs philanthro-capitalism overrides local agricultural techniques by focusing on global market-based solutions. This diverts attention from the role that global markets systemically play in creating hunger and poverty in the first place. ( Pambazuka ) This New York Times editorial discusses the human cost of the rich worlds subsidized appetite for biofuels. When it seemed that global food supply might run out in the past, food production grew to meet demand. This time it might not be so easy, with the demand for biofuels diverting food into energy for cars, rather than human beings. The UN warns against massive price increases for food grains and declining global food stocks, officials say as a result, the worlds poor are facing a perfect storm. Both supply and demand side factors have produced these changes global warming, increased production for animal feed and biofuels. The World Food Program representatives believe that the change in these factors is permanent. ( International Herald Tribune ) In 2005, a famine struck Malawi and a third of the population needed emergency food aid. In 2007, the same country is the number one southern African supplier of corn to the World Food Program. The Malawian government ignored the World Banks pressure to implement free market policies and to cut back on subsidies, and instead deepened their fertilizer subsidies, boosting the productivity of the countrys agriculture. ( International Herald Tribune ) Global cereal prices are increasing due to low global food stocks and higher transportation costs. The prices of cereal cause food inflation across the world, and further increase the price of bread, meat and milk. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) expect prices to remain high for several years, which could result in hunger for the worlds poor, as they will be unable to purchase sufficient amounts of food. ( OneWorld South Asia ) The price of food is increasing worldwide and several countries are on the brink of a food crisis. The reason for the increase is due to a combination of rising oil prices, greater amounts of food crops used for bio-fuel production, and unstable weather conditions. The rise in food prices has devastating consequences for the worlds poor who cannot afford to buy basic necessities and food to live above the subsistence level. ( Guardian ) The author of this YaleGlobal article expresses concern over a looming global food crisis. Food crop harvests are falling while consumption is increasing, and the author fears this will lead to social and political unrest. Also worrying is the increasing share of agriculture devoted to biofuels. Combined with growing consumption, environmental degradation, watershortages and urbanization and massive agricultural subsidies in rich countries this could spell disaster. Further, climate change leaves poor equatorial countries extremely vulnerable to weather changes and seasonal variation. Crop prices are rising to historic levels, reversing a long-term trend of steadily lowering world crop prices. For the third consecutive year the world is consuming more food grain than it produces, making the gap between demand and supply the largest in thirty years. This has dramatic consequences for poor countries as they are increasingly vulnerable to bad harvests. Further, high food grain prices will reduce poor countries purchasing power and hinder economic growth. Also, humanitarian groups fear that they will lose ground against hunger, as their food aid budgets will not reach as far as planned. ( Wall Street Journal ) This Foreign Policy in Focus article illustrates the negative economic effects of the US-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (FTA) on Korean agriculture. The FTA would seriously undermine Korean agricultural production and food safety laws, leading to a complete restructuring of the local agricultural practice. Koreas National Policy Institute estimates that the countrys agriculture may well disappear within the next 10-15 years as a result of the new FTA. Washington has suggested that the FTA could function as a blueprint for other US trade liberalization agreements with countries across Asia, which would lead to similar adverse consequences. A surge in demand for alternative fuels such as ethanol has caused the price of corn to rise to its highest level in ten years. Because corn is a staple food for billions of impoverished people around the world, these price increases have potentially devastating implications for both global poverty and food security, argues this Foreign Affairs article. The authors further point out that political and corporate interests dominate the ethanol industry, so that corn growers in rich countries receive substantial government subsidies which diminish the competitiveness of their developing country counterparts. This report published by Norwegian Church Aid, Danish Church Aid, Church of Sweden and Brot-fur-die-Welt finds that ever since African governments began liberalizing trade, food security has worsened on the continent. In particular, economic liberalization has harmed poor subsistence farmers. The author suggests that to achieve the Millennium Development Goal of halving hunger by 2015,the World Bank and local governments must abandon their present governance and liberalization policies. FAIR USE NOTICE. This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U. S.C 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 866 UN Plaza Suite 4050 New York, NY 10017 USA Phone: 1-646-553-3460 gpftglobalpolicy. org Copyright copy 2005 - 2017 Global Policy Forum. Designed by JoomlArt Joomla is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License. Global Agricultural Trading Continues to Provide Price Transparency Food ingredients date back more than 200K years. The human diet initially consisted of animal proteins, fish, fruits, vegetables and nuts. The introduction of grains into the human diet came approximately 10K years ago. This included wheat and barley with rice and corn coming about 3K years later. History of Food For most of history, human beings hunted or grew food for their own consumption, and food travelled only short distances. Historians can identify food regimes. European historians pinpoint the travel of food in the mercantile food system where grains milk and meat were produced locally but other foods were imported. Globally, approximately 800 million people suffer hunger. but only ten years ago, the total was almost 1 billion. The problem steps from distribution and the inability of the hungry to receive food that is timely and not contaminated. Growth of Agriculture Agricultural growth has accelerated globally, but was kicked into gear in the early 1990s following a 15-year process were the discovery of genetically modified organisms that were bacteria resistant. The birth of GMO technology came in 1973, when Herbert Boyer and Stanley Cohen created the first genetically engineered organism. In 1982, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved the first agriculture produced by a genetically modified organism. In 1992 the first food that was genetically modified was approved for commercial production. The United States was at the forefront toward of change to genetically modified agricultural products. In the grain space, corn and soybeans are mostly genetically modified, but wheat is not. Live wheat prices are available and along with corn and soybeans are actively traded with robust liquidity. After decades of prosperity, there has been a snap back in consumer behavior where individuals want food that is not genetically modified. In fact, the demand for organic grains has increased significantly over the past few years, with a large push coming in organic proteins. The largest increase in protein consumption comes from the increase in demand for organic chickens, along with organic eggs and organic milk. For a protein to be certified organic it has to be fed organic feed, which includes organic wheat, corn and soybeans. The United States is the largest consumer of organic agriculture. With production failing to meet demand, the United States has had to turn to imports, which account for the majority of the U. S. consumption. Organic production is global. Australia is the largest producer followed by Argentina, but country such as Romania and Turkey are experiencing accelerating increase in their production. From 2013 to the end of the second quarter of 2015, the majority of the corn by value that was imported into the United States came into the eastern region. Approximately 46 by value in U. S. dollars and 38 by quantity per the U. S. Customs Department. The majority of the organic corn that was shipped into the United States came from Romania which appears to be the largest supplier to East Coast organic corn imports. Approximately 37 of the organic corn imported into the United States comes from Romania. The two active ports in the United States taking shipments from Romania are Baltimore Maryland where approximately 62 comes into Baltimore and 38 into Norfolk. Organic agricultural is beginning to gain a foothold. Demand in the United States, the largest consumer of organic grains, outstrips supply, as organic grain production in the United States accounts for only 1 of total grain production. Food is one of the driving forces behind life, and agricultural food, is a global basic necessary that is traded actively. Although consumer demand goes through multiple iterations, the active trading of commodity products continues to drive global price transparency. FX Empire - das Unternehmen, die Mitarbeiter, die Tochtergesellschaften und die assoziierten Unternehmen, haften nicht und haften nicht für alle Verluste oder Schäden, die sich aus der Vertrauenswürdigkeit der auf dieser Website bereitgestellten Informationen ergeben. Die auf dieser Website enthaltenen Daten sind nicht unbedingt in Echtzeit verfügbar und sind nicht unbedingt korrekt. FX Empire kann eine Entschädigung von den im Netzwerk angebotenen Unternehmen erhalten. Alle hierin enthaltenen Preise werden von den Market Maker und nicht durch den Austausch erbracht. Da diese Preise möglicherweise nicht korrekt sind und sie vom tatsächlichen Marktpreis abweichen können. FX Empire trägt keine Verantwortung für Handelsverluste, die Sie als Link Ergebnis der Verwendung von Daten innerhalb der FX Empire entstehen könnte. Continue to FxempirePicture Credit: UN PhotoGill Fickling To solve the world hunger crisis, its necessary to do more than send emergency food aid to countries facing famine. Leaders must address the globalized system of agricultural production and trade that favors large corporate agriculture and export-oriented crops while discriminating against small-scale farmers and agriculture oriented to local needs. As a result of official inaction, more than thirty million people die of malnutrition and starvation every year, while large industrial farms export ever more strawberries and cut flowers to affluent consumers. Excessive meat production, again largely for the affluent, requires massive amounts of feed grains that might otherwise sustain poor families. Giant agribusiness, chemical and restaurant companies like Cargill, Monsanto and McDonalds dominate the worlds food chain, building a global dependence on unhealthy and genetically dangerous products. These companies are racing to secure patents on every plant and living organism and their intensive advertising seeks to persuade the worlds consumers to eat more and more sweets, snacks, burgers, and soft drinks. GPF Perspectives This paper discusses the main causes of the steep run-up in global food prices and the resulting spread of hunger to nearly a billion people worldwide. Authors James A. Paul and Katarina Wahlberg conclude that biofuels and the agro-industrial approach to food production are the main culprits of the food crisis. The paper looks at a wide range of factors endangering nutrition for all, including population growth, unsustainable consumption, international trade policy and climate change. The authors argue for effective and generous short-term aid as well as longer-term transformation of the agricultural system to make it more justly distributive, resilient, and sustainable for the future. ( Global Policy ForumFriedrich Ebert Foundation ) Global Policy Forums Katarina Wahlberg criticizes the World Banks proposal to create a Green Revolution in Africa. By focusing on boosting agricultural production through scientific development of more productive crops, the Bank disregards the fact that the Earths biological systems cannot be exploited forever. The supporters of the new Green Revolution also fail to address the major causes of the global food crisis, including biofuel production and unsustainable global consumption of meat. The author calls for a shift from industrial agriculture of export crops to sustainable agriculture for local consumption. ( World Economy amp Development in Brief ) Global Policy Forums Katarina Wahlberg warns that for the first time in decades, worldwide scarcity of food is becoming a problem. Increasing demand of cereals for food consumption, cattle feeding and in particular biofuel production, is driving food prices to record levels. Especially the poor, who spend a majority of their income on food, will suffer. To make matters worse, the food price hike is also affecting the amount of food aid available, as governments have not increased funding for the UNs World Food Programme. ( World Economy amp Development in Brief ) UN Documents Agroecology can double the worlds food production within 10 years, whilst mitigating climate change and alleviating rural poverty. Ecological methods enhance soil productivity and protect crops against pests by relying on the natural environment. This report by Olivier de Schutter, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, calls upon States to feed their population by adopting the efficient farming techniques. Conventional farming that relies on expensive inputs actually fuels climate change and is not resilient to climatic shocks. Fisheries support the livelihood of over 540 million people and fish products are the worlds most traded food commodity. According to the State of the Worlds Fisheries and Aquaculture report global wild food stocks have declined and fish farming cannot keep up its recent growth. The Report examines increased efforts to enforce trade measures and against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and the need for sustainable management of fisheries, which is often overlooked by policy-makers. (FAO) UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier de Schutter, commends Chinas remarkable social and economic progress over the past three decades. China has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. However, there are problems which including climate change, the shrinking of arable land and land degradation, which threaten agricultural production. De Schutter recommends that China move towards a more sustainable farming system to maintain current levels of production. Disproportionate buyer power in global food supply chains harm small-scale farmers. UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier de Schutter, asserts that competition law can address the abuse of dominant buyer power by global agribusiness firms. Competition law can designed to protect the right to food, so that global food supply chains can reduce rural poverty. The UN Conference on Trade and Development has released a Policy Brief outlining the impact of climate change on agriculture. For many developing countries, the agricultural sector is extremely important. Even though a climate change can have serious detrimental consequences for food security, the agricultural sector can be part of a solution to mitigate negative effects. This brief asserts the need for a significant shift from conventional methods, to sustainable food production systems that improve the productivity of small-scale farmers. (UNCTAD) FAOs annual flagship publication, The State of Food and Agriculture provides scientific assessment of the current issues in the food and agriculture debate. This years report draws attention to the rapid expansion of the livestock sector - driven by population growth, urbanization and rising affluence. It emphasizes the need for broader rural development policies and increased governance of the livestock sector, to ensure its impact on the environment is limited. ( FAO ) The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has released a new report on the link between the environment and the food crisis. Environmental degradation and losses of cropland and biodiversity threaten food production. The report analyses the impact of ecocide on agricultural yield and the food system and calls for sustainable investments along with policy regulation of the food market. ( UNEP ) Food crisis and climate change are challenging agriculture. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has released a new report, which points out that farming significantly contributes to the green house gas emissions while suffering from global warming at the same time. One of the key factors to mitigate climate change and meet food demand is the restoration of organic soils. The report calls for a more holistic vision that looks beyond narrow and unsustainable solutions. ( FAO ) Commercial seed production, a market dominated by a few transnational companies, reduces bio-diversity. The Special Rapporteur on Right to Food, Olivier de Schutter, is concerned about the dependency of small farmers on these big companies. He also addresses the unequal competition between the commercial and traditional seed system. He calls for investments and policies which favor small farmers in developing countries and not large producers or private investors. ( UNDPI ) This declaration calls upon UN members and international agencies to implement short-, medium - and long-term solutions to the global food crisis. The text urges member states to increase aid to small-scale farmers in affected countries and raise investments for research to boost food production. World leaders failed to agree on the specific causes of the food crisis, including the role played by biofuel production. Instead, the declaration recommends further investigation into the impact that biofuel production has on food security. ( Food and Agriculture Organization ) The Food and Agricultural Organization ( FAO ) predicts that even though global cereal production will increase in 2008, prices will remain at record high levels. Production is not growing fast enough to match the strong demand so countries cereal stocks will keep falling. Most of the production increase will take place in the US, EU, China and India. The majority of poor countries will experience a decline in production, making them even more dependent on imports and vulnerable to higher grain prices. Articles and Documents The USAs National Family Farm Coalition warnes that food safety as well as farmers livelihoods could be under threat if plans for a Transatlantic Free Trade Area were to materialise. The National Family Farm Coalition was among a wide range of civil society groups protesting against a Transatlantic Free Trade Area (TAFTA) in Arlington, USA, in May. One of the chief aspects of transatlantic negotiations is the mutual recognition by the USA and the EU of rules and regulations on trade and investment. Here, the focus is not so much on tariff barriers, but on what the US government refers to as behind the border policies such as health, environmental and financial protection. Eliminating these trade irritants, as they have been called by multinational corporations, is referred to as a reduction of non-tariff barriers in the on-going EU-US talks. (Rural21) ETC Group and EcoNexus have issued reports surrounding the corporate control that is entrenched in the global food chain. The reports delve in to the dominance of the agricultural sector particularly in the industrial farm inputs such as animal feed production, livestock breeding, fertilizerspesticides and seed production amongst others. Their findings show the devastation that these monopolies are causing to local farmers as their local breeds and food crop varieties have been lost. The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition, launched at the G8 summit in 2012, promises to reduce poverty for 50 million people over the next ten years by increasing private investment and agriculture-led growth in selected African countries. One year after the initiatives launch, evidence provided by a new Oxfam Briefing note about its implementation presents a worrying picture of its performance so far. (Oxfam) There is a vast number of proposals, strategies and initiatives how to improve food security and agricultural production. Suspiciously, one aspect is missing in these debates: Could import restrictions help to stimulate agricultural production and benefit small-scale farming families What are the preconditions for a rational and smart implementation of trade regulation to achieve these objectives These questions are taken up by Uwe Hoering in his report Alternatives to Food Import Dependency which he wrote for FDCL, a research and documentation institute working on Chile and Latin America. ( FDCL ) A coalition of NGOs, including Friends of the Earth Europe, Oxfam, the World Development Movement and SOMO have criticized the position EU finance ministers display with regard to financial regulation. They say the EU ignores how financial institutions continue to engage in food speculation, which endangers food security. New regulations are due to be adopted by 2014. ( SOMO ) Two German NGOs, Brot fr die Welt and WWF Germany, criticize the recent agreement on the reform of the EUs Common Agricultural Policy, which provides massive subsidies to large agricultural producers in EU countries. Not only does the reform miss the opportunity to make a meaningful impact in terms of environmental protection, but it also ignores export subsidies, which are a crucial issue for farmers in the global South. ( Brot fr die Welt, WWF Germany ) A coalition of British NGOs as well as the German NGO Misereor have emphasized that African civil society organizations reject the G8 New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition, according to statements that both groups published. Last weekend, the so-called Nutrition for Growth summit was held in London in anticipation of the G8 meeting this month in Northern Ireland. African civil society organizations reject the G8 approach and call into question its legitimacy in terms of deciding about African food security. ( World Development Movement, Misereor ) Germanys fourth largest bank, DZ Bank, and its subsidiary Union Investment, have announced that they will no longer engage in speculation with agricultural commodities, according to the NGO foodwatch. DZ Bank confirmed this through a letter sent to foodwatch. DZ Bank is the latest of a number of institutes which have announced their decision to stop the process of food speculation. ( Foodwatch ) Drought and a growing population have put a strain on food security in Kenya. In response, the Kenyan government is encouraging rice farmers to adopt an agricultural technique called System of Rice Intensification (SRI), which is widely used in India. The method allows farmers to grow their crops with limited water, whilst producing greater yields. Rice is a staple part of the Kenyan diet, but production in the country does not match demand and it relies heavily on imports from countries in Asia. The rice intensification program aims to make Kenya more self-sufficient, particularly in the face of climate change. FAO Director-General Jose Graziono da Silva cites small-scale food production and the recovery of agricultural biodiversity as the path towards increasing food security, particularly in rural areas. At a visit to the University of Gastronomic Sciences, he criticised the Green Revolution of the 1960s for its environmental destruction and detrimental impact on crop varieties that resulted from the heavy weight placed on chemical agrarian methods. He noted the need to recover traditional crops, support local production and link them to markets, allowing for an increase in their income. He highlighted the role of crops such as quinoa in the struggle against hunger, referencing the UNs International Year of Quinoa. Although da Silvas emphasis on agricultural and food diversity and rediscovering different foods is important, it ignores issues related to land grabbing and climate change. ( FAO ) Mars, Mondelez, Nestle Are Leaving Women Farmers Behind (March 8, 2013) Oxfam criticizes Mars, Mondelez and Nestle for their unequal treatment of women. Research into the ethical standards of their supply chain has revealed that female cocoa farmers in the global south often face discrimination. Even though women are crucial in the production system, they often receive unequal pay and are frequently denied access to land, credit, trainings and tools. On International Womens Day, Oxfam campaigned to encourage the companies to address these issues and urged them to take steps to make their products more sustainable. ( Oxfam Press Release) Brazil has introduced new initiatives to encourage sustainability and nutrition in the country by promoting the use of locally sourced produce in school meals. The program aims to support the production and consumption of quality food from small-scale farmers and increase their visibility in the local market. The government hopes that it will stimulate economic development, nutrition and food sovereignty in the country. The initiative follows on from the National School Feeding Program which was launched in 1955 as a social assistance program to tackle hunger problems. Today the focus is on creating a local food procurement system and on encouraging transparency and accountability in the school meal program. ( Al Jazeera) Oxfams Behind the Brands report assesses the ethical behavior of the top 10 food brands. The charity has rated companies such as Nestl, Mars and Coco-Cola in terms of their conduct towards womens rights land and water use climate change local communities small hold farmers and workers rights. The report reveals that these companies, which dominate the food market and collectively make over 1 billion a day, are not meeting ethical standards. Associated British Foods (ABF), owner of brands including Kingsmill, Ovaltine and Silverspoon got the lowest score with just 13 out of 70. It scored a poor one out of ten in its treatment of land, women and climate change. Oxfam hope to put pressure on these companies to re-examine how their activities encroach on human rights and the environment. However, the charity is calling on consumers rather than governments to push for this change. ( Guardian ) This article explores how the junk food industry drives the public to over-consume and become addicted to processed food. Colossal amounts of research, money and engineering go into the process of discovering how they can drive more ounces into more bodies more often. As well as overloading their products with sugar and salt to encourage addiction, they also create products that are intentionally bland in flavor and that melt when eaten to trick the brain into thinking that it hasnt consumed any calories, causing the consumer to eat and crave more. They target sections of the population that would be more susceptible to marketing and addiction. Coca-Cola for example, which refers to its biggest consumers as heavy users, has big campaigns in poorer and more vulnerable areas such as New Orleans. Transnational companies such as Kraft, Coca-Cola and Nestl disregard the health dangers of their items, often excusing their behavior by claiming that it is a matter of supply and demand. ( New York Times ) As part of the UN initiative Think. Eat. Save, ministers and high-level officials gathered in Nairobi recently to dine on food that would have otherwise been discarded for not meeting EU food aesthetic standards. The event was designed to raise awareness of the campaign which aims to reduce global food waste by changing consumer and retailer attitudes towards food. 1.6 tonnes of food was gathered from Kenyan farms that had been deemed unfit for sale in Europe and served at the dinner. Tristram Stuart, founder of Feeding the 5000, a partner organization to Think. Eat. Save notes that Its a scandal that so much food is wasted in a country with millions of hungry people. However, this food is not being farmed to feed the millions of people who suffer from food shortages in Kenya it is intended for export to the EU. The campaign doesnt address the fact that the UK and other EU countries are growing their food in Africa to begin with, a key issue within the modern food system. (UN Press Release) In the village of Darvesphura, in Indias poorest state, farmers are growing record-breaking amounts of rice, without the help of GMOs or herbicides. The increase in yield is a direct result of a farming method called System of Rice Intensification (SRI), which was developed by Henri de Laulanie, a French Jesuit priest and agronomist in Madagascar in the 1980s. An American Professor, Norman Uphoff, circulated the method in Asia which has helped to lift many people out of poverty. It has been described as a new green grassroots revolution, wholly opposite to the green revolution of the 1960s which relied heavily on technology and pesticides. Westerns governments, however, are holding back from investing in the method, preferring to finance technological research. ( Guardian ) Quinoa : To Buy or Not To Buy Is This The Right Question (February 15, 2013) The UN has designated 2013 as the International Year of Quinoa and has high hopes for its role in the fight against world hunger. The crop is becoming increasingly popular, with health enthusiasts heralding it as a super-food however, the question surrounding this popularitys impact on quinoa growers in the Andes is also topical, and contentious. Critics claim that the mounting demand for the super-grain increases its price and makes it inaccessible to poor Bolivians who rely heavily on it for nutrients. Others, including the UN, argue that the farmers are benefiting economically from the high demand for the crop. In either case, the responsibility is placed on the consumer: to boycott its sale or to increase it. This article argues that it is not consumer habits that are affecting the lives of the farmers it is rather the system behind production that really calls for change. Cheap US wheat products saturate the Bolivian market, undermining the local food market and making it difficult for local farmers to compete. Furthermore, the farming of the crop is having harmful effects on the land and ecosystems as the government pushes for the mechanization of the production system. ( Common Dreams ) The medical journal The Lancet has published a series of articles on non-communicable diseases and their role in the Post-2015 debate. This particular article looks at transnational food and drink corporations as drivers of NCDs. It examines their political behavior and how they work to undermine health regulations, drawing a close comparison to the tobacco and alcohol industries. Each year there are more than 9.4 million deaths caused by high blood pressure, 3.4 million from high body-mass index and 2 million from high cholesterol, much of which could be ascribed to the consumption of processed foods and drinks. Despite these health dangers, transnational companies such as Nestle and Coco-Cola have a big influence on public policies designed to fight NCDs and have a powerful position in the global market, in particular in low and middle income countries. The Lancet NCD Action Group calls on governments and civil society to work to protect public health and regulate the actions of these industries. ( The Lancet ) Bhutan is banning the sale of pesticides and herbicides and promoting traditional agricultural methods to become the worlds first wholly organic country. The government hopes this move will help the nation of small-hold farmers to produce more food and increase exports. The Buddhist country is leading the way in sustainable development, it is carbon neutral, food secure and 95 of the population has clean water and electricity. However, it is also suffering from the effects of globalization, consumerism and climate change. Many Bhutanese are reluctant to pursue an agrarian livelihood and are migrating to neighboring countries. Unpredictable weather has affected farmers harvests and growing numbers have come to rely on chemicals to improve their yield. Despite these set-backs, the government is confident that Bhutan will succeed in being agriculturally organic and as a Buddhist country, see this step as both practically and philosophically valuable. ( Guardian ) The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has plans to approve the AquAdvantage Salmon, the first-ever genetically engineered animal. It is being evaluated through the FDAs New Animal Drug Approval (NADA), a procedure intended to assess new animal drugs, not genetically engineered animals. As a drug is inserted at the one-cell stage of development, the animal is considered as a drug and is thus not required to be analyzed in reference to human health, animal welfare or environmental impacts. If this approval goes ahead, the GE meat process is likely to become concealed from consumers and as Friends of the Earth notes, FDAs approval will open the floodgates for other genetically engineered animals, including pigs and cows, to enter the food supply. (Common Dreams) Almost Half of the Worlds Food Thrown Away, Report Finds (January 10, 2013) The UKs Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) has released a report revealing that between 30 and 50 per cent of all food produced across the world is wasted every year. This global waste stems mainly from retailers and consumers demand for aesthetically perfect food and strict sell-by dates. The IMechE has also expressed concern over the high levels of water used in the process of food production, particularly in the production of meat. Due to high standards of physical appearance, about 550 bn cubic meters of water is wasted in growing products that are disposed of before they even reach the consumer. As the population is growing and food insecurity is increasing, the IMechE calls on governments, the UN and development agencies to tackle this problem. ( Guardian ) In recent years, many development organizations and NGOs have promoted linking large corporations with African smallholder farmers. Critics such as Patrick Mulvany from the UK Food Group argue that these developments are motivated by agribusinesses that depend on the imposition of an industrialised agricultural model in African countries for their own commercial success. Large agriculture firms such as Cargill and Monsanto now offer farmers greater access to fertilizer, quality seeds, finance and other services, creating a dependency that ultimately undermines smallholders. Agribusiness corporations see smallholder farmers as an opportunity to secure the food supplies at relatively cheap prices, using cheap labor and simultaneously creating a new market for proprietary agrochemicals. ( Guardian ) QampA: Food Production Accounts for 29 Percent of Greenhouse Gases (October 31, 2012) Food production represents 29 percent of the greenhouse gases that are causing global warming. Two reports released in Copenhagen by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) confirmed this. A QampA with the authors of these reports revealed that the emissions footprint of food production involves the combined emissions of all the stages of food production (manufacture of inputs like fertilizers, agriculture itself, food distribution and sales, and managing of food waste). The reports emphasize that the impacts of climate change with regards to food security will fall disproportionately on the people in developing countries, even when these people contribute very little to the global footprint. To reduce emissions, there must be new methods of food production as well as new food consumption patterns. ( IPS ) Betting on the Farm: Africas Drive for Food Self-Sufficiency (October 19, 2012) Food insecurity and dependency on food imports are a common problem in Africa, despite its abundant land and resources. Following the food crisis of 2007-2008, a number of African countries have been prioritizing efforts to tackle this problem and achieve food self-sufficiency based on the principles of national and regional food sovereignty. The heart of these strategies is to increase food production by substantially improving crop yields and emphasizing emerging local and regional African urban markets. Compared to earlier attempts, prospects for Africas food sovereignty appear more promising than before, and there is growing political pressure for measures protecting consumers from import and price volatility. However, significant financial investment is required to move past political rhetoric and decrease dependency on external food supplies. ( Think Africa Press ) Growing crops for food and fuel simultaneously can work, but food security must be a priority. The UN Special rapporteur on the right to food Olivier De Schutter argues thatwhile EUs plans to revise its biofuel targets downwards failed to go far enough. The remaining productive lands are under increasing pressure for biofuel production. International trade and investment in this field is intensifying this. Lowering targets for biofuel is insufficient and a guarantee of sustainability in agriculture requires domestic case-by-case measures. De Shutter proposes a model where smallholders would organize themselves into cooperatives that intercropped biofuel feedstocks with staple crops that were earmarked for local food markets. In this way biofuel production would in fact strengthen small-scale local food producers and food systems that have a long-term interest in maintaining the natural resource base. ( Guardian ) Over fishing by foreign fleets is threatening fish stock sustainability for local fishermen in West and Central Africa. Unregulated fishing and harmful techniques are destroying habitats and causing the oceans stocks to dramatically deplete, seeing many species move towards extinction. The Regional Commission for Fishing in the Gulf of Guinea (COREP) warns that this strain on resources threatens food security and livelihoods in the area. Governments must enforce measures to monitor the activities of foreign fishing fleets. Warnings are sidelined however, as authorities are reluctant to forsake the revenues they receive from selling fishing rights. (Think Africa Press) Financial speculation on food commodities brings uncertainty and volatility to the markets and is a major threat to the worlds poor. The Institute of International Finance has estimated that by the middle of last year, 450bn of financial assets was invested in commodities or derivatives betting on future price movements. UNCTAD is urging the worlds regulators to take a series of measures to control and limit speculation. A financial transaction tax is the most likely measure to succeed, as at least 11 European countries are close to adopting such a levy in the near future. But lobbying by financial firms will likely prevent any serious regulation of futures and derivatives. ( Observer) Stanford Researchers Show Oil Palm Plantations Are Clearing Carbon-rich Tropical Forests in Borneo (October 8, 2012) A new study by Stanford University researchers shows that the expanding production of palm oil is destroying tropical rainforests in Borneo and significantly increasing carbon dioxide emissions. Indonesia is the leading producer of palm oil and home to the worlds third largest tropical forest area. Due to rapid loss of these forests, Indonesia is one of the worlds largest emitters of greenhouse gases. Despite the fact that about 16, 000 square kilometers of forested lands has been cleared for plantations, accurate information about these plantations is not readily available for public review or oversight. Most residents in this area are unaware of these developments, which have dramatic effects on their livelihoods and environment. ( Farmland Grab ) Whats the Real Driver of High Food Prices and Hunger (September 6, 2012) The media coverage of the US drought and increase in food prices is welcomed but it perpetuates false ideas about the main causes and solutions to these problems. The Alternet article criticizes coverage that attributes price increases mainly to an increase in meat-based western diets in developing countries. While this is certainly a part of the explanation, it misses two problems underlying price volatility - financial speculation and the lack of publicly held food reserves. It also downplays the impact of biofuels. While dietary patterns change slowly, the use of biofuels can be quickly and decisively changed through government policies. ( Alternet ) Food Shortages Could Force World into Vegetarianism, Warn Scientists (August 26, 2012) To avoid catastrophic food shortages in the next 40 years, the worlds rapidly growing population may have to switch almost completely to a vegetarian diet, says the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI). SIWIs latest report warns that there will not be enough water available for everyone to adopt a Western-type diet. Vegetarian diets consume five to ten times less water and would hence increase the amount of water available to grow more food. The International Water Management Institute (IWMI) also states that investment in small-scale water solutions rather than large irrigation projects would increase household revenues across the global south. ( Guardian ) Has Organic Been Oversized (July 7, 2012) In the past decade, US corporations such as Kellogg, PepsiCo and General Mills have bought many small, independent organic companies and profited from the value-added price of organic food, making it a 30-billion-a-year business. Their domination of the board that sets standards for organic foods has also led to an increase in the number of nonorganic materials approved for organic production, from 77 in 2002 to more than 250 today. By turning organic into a marketing ploy and corrupting the organic food industry, corporate giants continue to maintain the unsustainable food and farming system that threatens the health of humans and the environment. (New York Times) How Fairtrade Bananas are Failing Migrant Workers (May 28, 2012) In the Dominican Republic, the Fairtrade banana industry is reliant on Haitian migrant workers who are paid below living wages and have no access to social security. More than half of the countrys bananas are exported the UK, where supermarkets are the most powerful actors along the supply chain and make high profits based on unsustainably low prices that they pay to suppliers. While fair trade standards are designed to ensure that producers from developing countries have long-term security, in practice, the standards are not helping migrant workers to earn a fair salary and decent living conditions. (Guardian) In this article, author Eric Schlosser argues that the current system of food production must be overhauled in favor of a new diverse, resilient, and democratic system. Schlosser states that the current system is overly centralized, overly industrialized, and overly controlled by a handful of companies that are overly reliant on monocultures, pesticides, chemical fertilizers. He says that the current low costs of food are deceptive, but whats gone wrong in our food system can be reversed if we move towards alternative small scale production systems, such as organic farming. ( The Atlantic ) As consumer markets in the US and Western Europe are shriveling, Walmart. the worlds largest corporation, is attempting to enter markets of developing economies. It is estimated that the value of grocery markets in the four BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) will amount to three billion dollars in the next four years. With an 8 percent growth rate, India shines as a lucrative market for retailers. Walmarts entry into the country would not only jeopardize the livelihoods of small farmers but also destroy the entire Indian system of farm to table farming. It seems that Walmart poses a bigger threat to small-scale agriculture than seed titan Monsanto. (IPS Terraviva) Multi-national Biotech company Monsanto spent 2 million in the first quarter of 2009 lobbying the US government that genetically engineered seeds were safe and did not need testing. Leaked cables and internal FDA documents show that FDA scientists believe genetically modified foods could lead to new diseases. Although 30 countries have significant restrictions or bans on GMOs, the US government approves of their use. ( UK Progressive ) This new Global Citizens report on the state of GMOs highlights the false promises and failures of genetically engineered (GE) seeds. Contrary to claims by global corporation Monsanto, GE crops do not control pests and weeds, increase crop yields, or lower the levels of chemicals used in food production, writes activist Vandana Shiva. The report calls for a shift towards agroecology, a biological-based, sustainable alternative to the current industrial food production model. ( Panna ) In order to feed a growing global population, food output must compete with biofuels production and rise by seventy percent in the next forty years, says Policy advisor to Qatars food security program Mahendra Shah. According to Shah, biofuels encourage deforestation, increase fertilizer usage, and will inevitably lead to rising agricultural prices and push hundreds of millions of people into hunger. ( Bloomberg ) Preeminent land activist Vandana Shiva emphasizes the need to resist the agro-industrial takeover of small farmers and communities. This fundamental shift has played a significant role in denying millions of people their right to food. According to Shiva, it is important to move away from food dictatorship and build food democracies, which address the challenges of seed monopolies and advocate agroecology. (The Nation) This article discusses how sustainable intensificationthe production of food while reducing agricultures negative impacts on the environmentis a better alternative to GMO technology. Unlike GMO crops that rely on synthetic fertilizer and pesticides, sustainable farming increases the capture of carbon in the soil while simultaneously decreasing health risks from exposure to toxic chemicals. In this article Anna Lapp, co-founder of the Small Planet Institute, argues that GMOs do not strengthen social networks or up production significantly and they are not the answer to global food needs. (Civil Eats) During a campaign tour in the Midwest, Obama announced plans to spend up to 510m building biofuels refineries. These refineries will produce fuel from corn, wood chips, or grasses for the US navy and reduce Americas dependence on foreign oil, said Obama. Like corn ethanol, another government-backed biofuel, investment in these types of biofuels could further constrict food supplies and hike global food prices, as seen with corn ethanol. ( Guardian ) US farmers have begun growing Enogen-branded genetically modified (GM) corn plants to produce ethanol for commercial purposes. Critics of Enogen believe farmers will be drawn to the new efficient ethanol form of corn and consequently produce less food for human consumption. Studies show a well-established relationship between expanding biofuels production and rising global food prices. There is also much worldwide resistance to the introduction of this new GM corn. The EU, South Korea, and South Africa have not approved the import of the new GM corn and food industry groups in the US also oppose the new Enogen corn, citing cross-pollination fears. ( Guardian ) In an effort to foster trade and boost exports, Russia is looking to sell about 24 million hectares of arable land, below-market price, to Asian countries seeking to invest in foreign farmland for food security purposes. Currently, a reported 409 million acres of farmland are unused in Russia. The Russian government plans to acquire more land for lending, by annulling ownership rights to land that has not been cultivated for three years. Russias focus on Southeast Asia is part of a wider effort to build stronger ties with the fastest growing region in the world. ( Bloomberg ) The neglect of sustainable agriculture in Africa must end says Kanayo Nwaze, president of the UNs International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The Somali famine serves as a warning to African governments and the international community to invest in small-scale farming. Development assistance for agriculture fell from 20billion (in the 1990s) to 3billion (in the early 2000s) due to an emphasis shift from agriculture to industrialization. Agriculture accounts for approximately 30 of sub-Saharan Africas GPD but represents 80 of export earnings in other countries. Nwaze is confident that diversification, rural investment, the stemming of migration, and reduction in the gap between rural and the urban populations can boost food productivity and generate income for countries in Africa. ( Guardian ) This article from Nourishing the Planet, a project of the Worldwatch Institute, identifies inefficiencies within the current food system and outlines ways in which producers and consumers can work together to increase food security. Recommendations include using low-cost technology, such as cell phones, to give farmers direct access to market information and ensure fair pricing. Such practices will increase market transparency and allow for the fair distribution of food, says Nourishing the Planet. With a growing global population, it is important to address problems in the current food system, rather than only channeling efforts into producing more crops. ( Worldwatch Institute ) The European Unions (EU) reform of its Common Agricultural Policy does not include any change for subsidies to EU agricultural producers. The EU argues at the World Trade Organization that its supports are no longer trade distorting, since they are not tied to farmers production. According to this analytical note, these distortions have far-reaching implications for developing countries, including impacts on small farmers. The EUs developing country partners negotiating trade agreements should protect themselves against EU-created distortions in agricultural trade. (South Centre) Chinas increasing domestic demand for food could mean a rise in imports of key grains to feed its growing population. China is usually a large net exporter of grains like corn, rice and wheat, so an increase in imports may affect the price of food commodities worldwide. As Chinas population becomes wealthier, dietary changes include more meat consumption. According to the Chinese director of the State Councils office on rural policy, decision-makers should rethink the notion of food self-sufficiency. (Wall Street Journal) Industrial agriculture methods, involving the intensive use of energy, water, machinery, and chemicals to grow crops, cannot be relied upon to feed people in the future. The UN Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier de Schutter says that the combination of agronomics and ecological science, known as Agroecology, best suits the needs of the 21st century. De Schutter believes that resource efficiency should be the prime objective - saving water, preserving soil, and de-linking agriculture from fossil energies. (AlterNet) The EUs Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) that subsidizes European farmers is notable because of the harm it causes to producers in the developing world. Now, Eastern European farmers, who do not receive high subsidies as their Western European counterparts, are lobbying for reform to make arrangements more equitable. This article highlights the many failings of the CAP, and advocates for changing the system. However, this seems improbable at the present. ( Langlophone ) Global wheat prices have doubled in the past two years due to a combination of factors, including changing weather and grain commodity speculation. Financial market mechanisms create perverse incentives resulting in farmers planting other crops such as soy and cotton chasing higher returns. In order to avoid such problems, governments should better regulate food commodities, particularity grains and cereals. This article analyses the causes of the decline in global stockpiles, such as export bans on farmers in Russia, crop production and increasing food prices resulting in riots. (Bloomberg) According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, bees pollinate around 71 of the 100 crop species which provide 90 per cent of food worldwide. But bees are dying out rapidly. A new report by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) says that toxic chemicals in pesticides cause a loss in the sense of direction and memory for bees, which they rely on to find food. UNEP advises farmers to take more care when applying insecticides and other chemicals, and restore bee-friendly habitats. (The Australian) Fishermen discard more than 10 per cent of all the fish caught for human consumption. As much as two-thirds of the fish caught in some areas ends up back into the water, usually dead, due to the current EU system of fishing quotas. EU Ministers plan to make the most radical change to fisheries policy in 40 years. A common fisheries policy, reform fishing quotas, means that fishermen do not need to throw away large amounts of their catch. (Guardian) Chinas approach to food security as national security can offer important lessons for the rest of the world. A policy of maintaining an emergency grain reserve means that China does not play a significant role in global grain markets, despite being the worlds largest wheat producer. China also stores foods like pork and edible oils. Many other nations do not follow the same approach. This article argues that given the current volatility of the global food system, more countries should look into the idea of food reserves to feed their own populations. (Foreign Policy In Focus) Humans have caught and consumed over 65 per cent of all large fish species in the last 100 years. Experts say that this ecological imbalance will forever change the oceans, with only small fish such as sardines and anchovies thriving in future decades. Overfishing in East Asia is problematic since almost 50 percent of the increase in the worlds fish consumption for food comes from that region. The UN Environment program says international organizations and governments should regulate number of fishing boats and the days they fish in order to stabilize fish populations. (The Washington Post) Chinas major agricultural regions are affected by the worst drought in 60 years, threatening crop production and drinking water supplies. Any decision by its government to import large quantities of food will further increase high food prices. The International Rice Research Institute says that the countrys grain situation is critical to the entire world. China produces more wheat than any other nation, and is the worlds largest importer of soybeans, making them very important to the world food market. (New York Times) NATO and foreign governments have spent 200 million to flight piracy off the coast of Somalia, but they have failed to address the plundering of Somalias fisheries by Asian and European fishing fleets. The rapid growth of piracy is linked to the destruction of Somalis local fishing sector. According to the High Seas Taskforce, these illegal fleets break international conventions, destroy marine stocks and deny some of the worlds poorest people their source of protein and livelihoods. (The Africa Report) Developing countries are taking action against rising food prices, including price caps and export bans. Many governments are concerned that speculation on food prices will cause another political crisis, similar to the violent riots in 2008. Indonesia is removing import tariffs on over 50 items including wheat, soybeans, fertilizer and animal feed. India is extending the ban on the export of lentils and cooking oil. The UN and World Bank advise governments to invest more in new production and agricultural infrastructure to match the rising demand for food. (Wall Street Journal) In India, two fifths of the population is hungry and 75 per cent of Indians lack adequate food and nutrition. At the same time tones of stored grain decay in warehouses. The government of India is unwilling to reform the system of food distribution to feed hungry people. This article examines the option of an equity-based social framework where agriculture and natural resources are paramount. A legal guarantee through a universal regime of food security is needed to feed hungry people and eradicate poverty in India. (South Asian Citizens Web) The Foresight Report on Food and Farming Futures, a study into food security commissioned by the UK government, says that the current world trade and food production system is unsustainable and fails to end hunger. The report recommends the minimization of waste, as well as the sustainable production of food in order for the system to provide good health and nutrition to a growing world population. The report also calls for government intervention to protect poor people from sharp price increases. (BBC) An extra 75 million people are malnourished due to recent food price rises. But real supply and demand do not determine prices, instead banks, hedge funds and financiers are making billions of dollars by speculating on food. Staple foods as well as cocoa, fruit juices, sugar, meat and coffee are all now global commodities, along with oil, gold and metals. Olivier de Schutter, UN Rapporteur on the Right to Food, has no doubt that speculators are a major cause of rising prices. ( Guardian) The US Agriculture Department reduced its estimates for global harvests of key crops, including corn and soy beans, due to tightening food supplies and rising food prices. Supply constraints reflect the dry weather in South America and Russia and floods in Australia. Another problem is the use of crops by the biofuel industry, which in the US enjoys extensive government incentives. A rising population is putting unsustainable pressures on resources such as water, food and energy, which could cause social and political instability and irreparable environmental damage. (Wall Stret Journal) Agribusiness companies in the US are recipients of federal farm subsidies that impact the world economy and the environment. This article examines the influence of the US Farm Lobby on Washingtons foreign policy. US farmers export goods like cigarettes and pop corn to blacklisted countries under the guise of humanitarian aid through legal loopholes. Agricultural protectionism by the US is not only detrimental to foreign policy, but also threatens the world trade and food production system. (Foreign Policy In Focus) The price of sugar, grain and oilseed drove world food prices to a record high in December 2010. It is the sixth consecutive month in which the UN food price index has risen. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization warn that prices could rise even higher given the droughts in Argentina and floods in Australia affecting crop yields and commodity prices. Grain prices impact significantly on the food budgets of people in poor countries. An increase in food prices would almost certainly increase world hunger and set off another global food crisis. (New York Times) UK agriculture and environment minister, Caroline Spelman, recently chastised EU governments for their Common Agriculture Policy (CAP), because of its enormous cost in a time when government finances are looking wobbly. Spelman proposes to replace direct subsidies with income supports tied to enhanced environmental protection. Farm subsidies in the worlds advanced economies are inherently unequal, and when viewed within the broader context of rising food prices, climate change, and increasing protectionism, it is clear that the current system urgently needs modification. ( Reuters ) The bumblebee is an important pollinator of many agricultural crops around the world, including most fruits, vegetable and nuts as well as coffee, soya beans and cotton. Ninety per cent of the worlds commercial plants are dependent on pollination by bees to increase yield. These insects, along with other pollinators, have been in serious decline in the last few decades. There is concern about the impact this could have on global food production. UN conservation strategies may help to mitigate further losses. (Guardian) The fisheries sector plays a critical role in reducing poverty, hunger and malnutrition for many developing countries. Coastal states particularly should ensure regional collaboration on shared fish stocks. Recent statistics indicate that fish stocks are continuing to declining due to over-fishing, poaching by unlicensed vessels and illegal fishing. The Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, regional fisheries bodies and others are working on conservation and protect. (Today) Myanmar is the second largest opium poppy grower in the world, after Afghanistan. Conflict in the north and growing food insecurity is resulting in small-scale farmers growing poppy in order to feed their families. According to this report, 77 of the 1.2 million farmers growing poppy are doing so to pay for food. The production of these drugs is mostly for export within the region and internationally. Without more attention to the human and food insecurity problem, convincing farmers to stop the production of such a lucrative drug will be difficult. (IRIN) Small farmers and local food producers all around the world often find themselves driven off their land. When governments do not invest enough in local agriculture, these farmers are left vulnerable and impoverished. UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier de Schutter says that the most sustainable solution for developing countries is to reinvest in domestic agriculture to feed their own populations. These countries should also diversify their economies in order to decrease dependency on a limited range of export crops. (IPS) The International Fund for Agriculture and Development (IFAD) have released a report on volatile food prices, the effects of climate change and a range of natural resource constraints which complicate the fight to end rural poverty. IFAD says that food production will have to increase by 70 per cent to feed the expected world population of 9 billion by 2050. Rural poverty rates have dropped over the last decade. However the situation for women farmers has not improved. Women still face limited access to land tenure, credit and equipment, and market opportunities. (IPS) The prices of wheat, maize and other traded foods have risen by up to 40 percent in a few months. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, the food import bills for the worlds poorest countries are predicted to rise 11 percent in 2010 and by 20 percent for low-income food-deficit countries. The food prices would then reach a level not seen since the food crisis in 2008. The price inflation is partly fuelled by food commodity speculation. Legal regulations that control global food speculation are needed before to avoid a repetition of the 2008 crisis and millions of more hungry people. ( Guardian) FAO estimates that 925 million of the worlds people are undernourished. Because of the rising US corn price, that number could now grow higher. Even the smallest increase in bushel prices for corn, grain or wheat can have a devastating impact on food availability for millions of people. A weakened dollar has led to rising speculation in the commodity market and increased price volatility, while climate change is diminishing production. Experts fear another global food crisis. (Countercurrents) Structural barriers to sustainable development are woven in the malfunctioning neoliberal economic policies. For issues like food security, poverty eradication and reaching a sustainable environment, governments have to think outside the neoliberal box. Neoliberal institutions like the G20 are not looking to help developing countries to become food secure. Instead, developing countries are increasingly dependent on food imports, and the G20 chooses to look the other way since they dont want to hurt the commercial interests of corporate agricultural giants. In this interview, Devinder Sharma explains. (Share the Worlds Resources) Western lifestyle often literally means taking food from poor people - the harsh truth is the hunger of the poor is in part a choice of the rich. Putting limits on food speculation, making cut-backs to the global food trade and assisting poor nations in creating food sovereignty are some of the things that have to be made if hunger is ever going to be defeated. The cause of hunger is not so much about a lack of food as unfair allocations of the worlds resources. Acknowledging self-sufficiency is critical and by growing our own food, the power of corporate agriculture will be undermined. (Share the Worlds Resources) About 7 million people in Afghanistan, over 24 percent of the countrys population, are food insecure. Afghanistan is largely a food deficit country. But wheat although considered a strategic crop and staple food - is not encouraged by the Afghan Ministry of Agriculture. Instead, it promotes export crops like fruit and saffron because they receive a higher price in international markets. Donors such as USAID condone this trade-oriented food production strategy while Afghani people rely on food aid. This is just one example of the distorted global food system that continues to burden people worldwide. ( IRIN ) Bill Clintons Doubletalk on Haitian Agriculture (May 17, 2010) Bill Clinton has admitted that the US free-market agriculture policy towards Haiti did not work. But the solutions Clinton puts forward, as the UN Special Envoy to Haiti, calls for more of the same failed policies. Clintons presidential policies toward Haiti deliberately reconfigured the country to fit into the new global division of labor, turning relatively self-sufficient farmers into low-wage workers in assembly plants. Now, Clinton ignores practical ideas put forward by Haitian popular organizations, while the ex-president continues to bolster export-oriented cash crops like coffee, mangos, and avocados. ( NACLA ) Liberias agricultural sector has been suffering from underdevelopment due to fourteen years of civil war. The Liberian government is now investing in its farmers and creating a long-term plan to counter the stagnation. The governments main priority is food security and decreasing the countrys dependence on food imports. In conjunction with the United Nations, the Liberian government developed a food and nutrition program that calls for investing in the countrys infrastructure so that Liberian farmers are able to increase food production for national consumption. ( Reuters AlertNet ) Cuba will bring farming to the suburban areas around cities and towns, providing the science and leadership for alternative, localized models of food production. This approach brings food production closer to the urban areas where 76 percent of the islands population lives. The approach, which will not only provide food but also cultivate carbon sinks, create water basins, and reduce emissions, is based on principles of crop diversity and the use of animals for traction and transport of produce.( IPS ) 100 billion a year in US and EU farm subsidies are distorting world trade and harming exporters in poor countries. This article asks if the global financial crisis presents an opportunity to get rid of these astounding distortions. Many lobbyists and politicians in high income countries obstruct efforts to reform these policies that devastate poor countries. ( Africa Report ) Cheap food causes poverty and hunger. This article explains the contradictory nature of food and agriculture under globalization. The demand for low food prices means many farmers are getting less money for their crops and struggle to support themselves. As farmers go out of business, long term food security is also at risk. The author blames the demand for cheapness for the food crisis, concluding that there are some essential things, such as our land and the life-sustaining foods it can produce, that should not be cheapened. ( Resurgence ) The worlds largest agribusiness companies squeeze the agriculture system from both the supply and demand side, threatening food security. Seed prices overall have risen 146 percent in the last decade as many farmers in the US and worldwide have no choice but to buy seeds from Monsanto, the worlds largest GM seed company. As well, agribusiness mergers in the last two decades have concentrated the industrys buying power in the hands of a small number of corporations, threatening farmers to get big, or get out. ( Triple Crisis ) Colonialism Lives In Biotech Seed Proposal for Africa (March 20, 2010) Biotechnology is playing an increasing role in African agriculture. As a result, farmers are becoming more dependent on imported technology - a fact that hinders local sustainability. US companies, Monsanto and Pioneer, plan to export more biotech corn seed to Africa - claiming yields will increase to provide more food and profit for all. However, companies sell seed at a great cost to farmers and enforce strict rules to prohibit sowed seeds being used for future seasons. Moreover, the agricultural methods promoted are designed for monoculture production on large scale acreages (like in the US) and are unsuited to the small scale production methods of African farming. (Institute for Agriculture and Trade) Large Agribusiness Hurting Small Landholders, says UN Rights Expert (March 5, 2010) The global food sector is dominated by transnational corporations and as a result small landowners and farmers are suffering, says Olivier de Schutter, UN Special Rappotteur on the Right to Food. De Schutter says that smallholders in developing countries are suffering hunger and poverty because of the tremendous market influence of the companies. He proposes that governments use tax incentives, legal protection of rights of agricultural workers, and action against foreign suppliers that abuse the rights of local producers. (UN News Centre) Reclaiming Rice From Rats and Rot (January 14, 2010) Experts estimate that in 2009 Liberia lost up to 60 of its harvest due to vermin infestation and poor weather conditions. Resultantly food insecurity has increased. In response, UN officials are calling for donors to invest in pest control and food storage systems. Likewise, FAO and the Liberian Agriculture Ministry have recognized the problem and set up field schools to train farmers how to protect their crops from pests. (IRIN) Rwanda has recorded a sharp increase in food productivity. In 2009, the Government invested in fertilizer distribution, improving seed stocks and crop husbandry training. Together these investmentshave boosted the output of major food crops such as maize, potatoes, cassava and rice. Rwanda now has sufficient food reserves to meet domestic demands for eight months. (IRIN) This report by Oxfam International advocates for building up the resilience of vulnerable farm operations. Building up such resilience not only depends on helping farmers to best manage their resources, but also on collaboration of local, national and global institutions. The report underlines the importance of farmer-driven decisions as well as gender-based policies that aim to meet the specific needs of women farmers. (Oxfam) In Rome, the World Summit on Food Security has attracted only few leaders of rich countries. The summit reveals the wide gap between the rich and the poor countries agriculture and trade policy. In addition, the summit has failed to fulfill expectations on aid and agriculture assistance. Change seems far away and leaders have expressed their concern that the conference will produce little of substance. ( New York Times ) In 2008, food prices reached historically high levels, leaving millions of additional people in hunger. Policy makers and civil society have called for public food reserves in order to stabilize prices and mitigate the food emergency. International agricultural and trade policy have led to price instability, with devastating effects on developing countries. This paper calls for a discussion in which food reserves form part of a reformed trade system. ( Share the Worlds Resources ) Industrial agriculture plays a key role in the climate crisis. Agro industry heavily uses fertilizer, pesticides and herbicides, which damage natural soil fertility. According to this report from GRAIN, agro industry depletes soil, which results in up to two third of the excess carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere. GRAIN sharply criticizes this highly concentrated food system and calls for a fundamental policy change and the return to small-scale and ecologically friendly farming. ( GRAIN ) Africa and Global Food Crisis (September 3, 2009) In this interview with Afroline, Olivier de Schutter, a UN special rapporteur, clarifies different aspects of the African food crisis. De Schutter puts the emphasis on discrimination and marginalization rather than imbalance of supply and demand, to explain the current hunger problem in Africa. The UN rapporteur touches also the controversial issue of land grabbing, as oil-rich countries buy lands in poor countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America. (Pambazuka) Food production and energy consumption are closely interlinked. Due to the heavy use of fertilizer, the agriculture industry depends more than ever on energy inputs. The long-term trend of high energy prices threatens the food system. The environmental movement favors a return to local and organic farming in order to close the inflationary price gap. ( CIBC World Markets ) The EU promotes the worlds biggest agricultural aid program and spends almost 53 billion in subsidies - half of its annual budget. Non-traditional farming companies receive an important share of the aid, which contradicts the original idea of production incentives and price support. Further, farmland ownership already entitles landlords to subsidies regardless of agricultural use. The Queen of England and airport caterers are among recipients of this giant subsidy system. ( NY Times ) Experts claim that the industrial food system and the factory farm model lie at the roots of the Mexican borne swine flu. For years, public authorities have ignored early warning signs about the overcrowded and unsanitary conditions of intensive meat production and have instead supported corporate cover-ups. Pharmaceutical companies and vaccine producers reap the benefits from the swine epidemic and public authorities continue to prioritize the interests of large corporations instead of the health of local communities. ( GRAIN ) Following the military intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) developed agricultural reconstruction programs, aimed at helping farmers rebuild their agricultural activities and providing alternatives to the cultivation of opium. However, these agricultural reconstruction programs legitimize the US military occupation and enable foreign seed companies and agribusiness to establish their presence in a potentially lucrative market. The symbiotic work between US military and agribusiness jeopardizes Afghan farmers livelihoods and gives a monopoly to US companies over seed supply to Afghanistan. After the complete withdrawal of combat troops, the remaining military forces will serve as aid workers to safeguard US military power in Afghanistan and Iraq and protect US corporate interests. ( GRAIN ) African farmers, researchers and civil society speak out against Western-led campaigns which champion genetically engineered (GE) crops as a solution to world hunger. Compiling experiences and voices from African opposition, this report challenges the Gates Foundations Alliance for a New Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA). The document complements a UN Environmental Programme (UNEP) report, which reveals the likelihood of biotech solutions deepening, rather than solving hunger problems. As the West exploits the food crisis as an opportunity to promote GM crops, Voices from Africa urges Africa to resist bullying tactics that force the continent to adopt biotechnology solutions. Instead, the report emphasizes investment in small-scale agriculture, which will enable farmers to take control over food production.( Oakland Institute ) Even mainstream economists acknowledge that speculation in commodity markets contributed to the rise in food prices in 20072008, which pushed millions more people into hunger. After the subprime mortgage bubble burst and stocks began to fall in the US, institutional investors sought new high-return bets for their money, moving onto speculation in commodity markets. This distorted the price of food staples such as rice and contributed to rapidly rising food prices. To avoid such speculation in the future, the author recommends a food trade register at the commodity exchanges and corresponding regulation of commercial traders. ( World Economy, Ecology and Development ) A new study produced by the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP), entitled The Environmental Food Crisis, warns that unless the global systems of agricultural production undergo radical change, millions more will go hungry. Demonstrating the success of organic agricultural models, UNEP Executive Director states that future agricultural production must adopt methods that increase crop yields without creating the environmental and social damage that resulted from industrial agricultural production. Agro-businesses tread carefully ( Inter Press Service ) Monsanto hails its genetically engineered drought-tolerant corn as a solution to food security in the face of global warming. But research findings reveal the flaws of genetically engineered crops, which suffer yield losses under the erratic weather patterns caused by climate change. This article argues that agricultural policy must prioritize needs of food-insecure famers, not profit-driven agribusinesses. Organic farming practices require fewer energy inputs and withstand impacts like drought more efficiently. Organic farming offers smallholder farmers a more accessible and affordable option to exorbitantly priced GM crops. ( Grist ) This article urges for a farm bill that addresses the problems of industrialized agriculture, which has lead to soil loss, pollution, the destruction of rural communities and made our food supply dependent on fossil fuels. The authors argue that a national agricultural policy based on ecological principles is needed in order to keep up production and to preserve the land. The proposals to protect the soil and to reduce greenhouse gases include increasing the mixture of grain-bearing perennials and using crop rotations, which would simultaneously increase employment opportunities in agriculture. ( New York Times ) Agriculture is multifunctional with commodity and non-commodity outputs. The International Assessment of Agriculture Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) has released a benchmark report. This assessment addresses the challenges to increase agricultural productivity on a sustainable base and to create opportunities for small-scale farms. It takes into account the multiple dimensions of agriculture and emphasizes the need to incorporate agricultural knowledge, science and technology in order to fight hunger and poverty. ( IAASTD ) Speculation on agricultural commodities increases food prices and undermines food security for low-income countries, where people generally spend about 60-80 percent of their income on food. This report argues that governments worldwide should register speculators in a trade register to control trade and prevent speculation on food commodities. ( Eurodad ) This working paper for the International Follow-Up Conference in Doha November 2008, proposes a new financial architecture including a special tax on capital assets and improved supervision of investors. The paper describes the current financial system as a casino economy, based on competition, speculation and pursuit of profit, which contributes to increasing food prices and makes the poor pay the costs of the global financial crisis. ( Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst ) This report outlines the root causes of the global food crisis and addresses problems, such as trade conditions, biofuel production and financial speculation. Further, the report points out that many people participate in riots against the conditions of the global food system. ( Institute for Food and Development Policy ) Sudan, a country that receives a billion pounds of food from international donors, is exporting its own crops and capitalizing on high global food prices. Government officials argue that building up the agricultural sector will diversify Sudans economy and make the country self-sufficient. However, millions are starving in the conflict-ridden region of Darfur as international aid agencies struggle to deliver food. The Sudanese government continues to disrupt efforts of aid agencies to feed the people in Darfur at a time when international organizations lack adequate funds to purchase and deliver food. ( New York Times ) Conventional economists argue that everyone will benefit if countries specialize in producing a few different food commodities and import the rest. But without any protection of the domestic market, farmers in poorer countries must compete with commodities subsidized by richer countries. As over 29 countries have restricted food exports to ensure that their people have enough to eat, the import-dependent countries have even less access to food. A group of food-importing countries is promoting an agreement in the Doha Development Round to prevent countries from unilaterally restricting exports. ( New York Times ) People are protesting the soaring prices of oil and food throughout Asia. In Vietnam, low-wage factory workers are on strike against the 70 percent increase in food prices since 2007 that has in turn led to a 25 percent inflation rate. Policymakers across Asia are responding to social discontent by raising interest rates to curb high inflation, says Christian Science Monitor . However, Asian governments are facing a dilemma - they must raise interest rates without undermining growth because their popularity is contingent upon a booming economy. The World Food Summit declaration neglects to address the root causes of global food insecurity. World leaders failed to reach a solution on biofuel production, even though the International Food Policy Research Institute calculated that production of biofuel is responsible for 30 of the rise in food prices. Furthermore, the declaration urged governments to reduce trade restrictions, even though trade liberalization is one of the main causes of the food crisis. ( OpenDemocracy ) Director General of the World Trade Organization Pascal Lamy claims that liberalizing trade will strengthen the production capacity of developing countries and render food prices less vulnerable to change. But, the author fears that further deregulation of trade will make food prices more volatile and allow large multinational companies to undermine local production in poor countries. Finding a sustainable solution will require world leaders to increase investment in agriculture and support small-scale farmers agro-ecological methods. (Inter Press Service) This Foreign Policy In Focus article argues that the shift of countries from net-exporters to net-importers of food caused the global food crisis. The author criticizes the IMF and World Banks structural adjustment programs that lowered countries investments and social spending. Several poor countries dedicated land for export crops to service their debt to the World Bank and IMF. As a result, food production has declined and food insecurity has grown. For example, from 1966-70, Africa exported an average 1.3 million tons of food a year but almost all African countries are now net food importers. At the UN Food Summit in Rome, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon made several short - and long-term recommendations to address the food crisis. Although he recommended implementing social protection programs and supporting smallholder farming, Ban also endorsed more controversial measures such as a Green Revolution in Africa and minimizing trade restrictions. Despite widespread criticism of biofuels, the Secretary General neglected to acknowledge how biofuel production leads to food shortages. ( UN News ) The 2008 global food crisis demonstrates the destructiveness of the one-two punch of IMF-imposed adjustment and WTO-imposed trade liberalization. These policies have steadily marginalized farmers, and transformed self-sufficient agricultural economies into vulnerable, import-dependent ones. Large industrial farms and grain-trading corporations control the global food market. However, poor countries increasingly defy World Bank, IMF and WTO policies with fruitful results and farmers movements such as the Via Campesina are gaining in influence. ( The Nation ) Economists argue that increased speculation in agricultural commodities is pushing up food prices, a phenomenon termed as agflation. But, others argue that agro-prices are still recovering from their dramatic decrease of the 1980s. The price of corn, for example, is still below the 1945-1980 average. Although analysts have differing theories, the author concludes that speculation is one of the many causes of the global food crisis. ( World Economy and Development in Brief ) In this interview, physicist Vandana Shiva explains that the global economic structure is incompatible with the basic physics of the planet. Unsustainable, large-scale agriculture not only displaces small peasants, creates poverty and bad food, but also emits a huge quantity of carbon into the atmosphere, causing climate instability. Perversely, large agribusinesses with a stranglehold of the world economy, such as Cargill and Monsanto, harvest super-profits while people starve. ( AlterNet ) Raj Patel, author of the book Stuffed and Starved: The Hidden Battle for the World Food System, wants consumers to stop feeling guilty about eating unhealthy foods. Instead, consumers should get angry at the food corporations that have chipped away at their ability to choose, leaving low-income families with the so-called choice between Burger King and MacDonalds, and between Pepsi and Coke. Patel argues that major food producers have spent millions on research and marketing to convince their customers to eat unhealthy food that only benefits the corporations. ( AlterNet ) This article criticizes the effect of industrial agriculture on global food security. The author points out that a few large corporations have patented or genetically modified most of the plants humans rely on for their basic needs. These corporations use chemical and genetic technologies to dominate agricultural production from seed to stomach and to profit from every bite. In addition, industrial food production exhausts Earths basic biological support systems, and makes the planet more vulnerable to climate change. ( AlterNet ) Some world leaders argue that the WTO Doha Round will solve the global food crisis. But, this Institute for Agricultural and Trade Policy (IATP) article says increased trade liberalization will reinforce poorer countries dependence on food imports. Further, deregulation policies will increase the power of transnational agribusinesses at the expense of local farmers. Instead, the IATP argues, world leaders should reform the rules governing international trade to control the market power exerted by agribusiness companies. Cargill is one of a handful of corporations that control the global system of food production and agriculture. By selling farmers agricultural input, and then buying outputs for further processing, Cargill has created a worldwide agricultural system in which it is both buyer and seller and has near unlimited freedom to maximize profit. In this report, Food amp Water Watch warns that Cargills enormous and under-regulated influence on global agricultural trade threatens the health of consumers, family farmers, the environment and even entire economies and governments. Since the 1970s, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund pushed for large-scale industrial agriculture, trade liberalization and other structural adjustment policies in poor countries, causing the structural meltdown that led to the global food crisis. The global market system which puts the needs of investors before the nutritional needs of humans has transformed food from nourishment into a commodity for speculation and bargaining. Nearly all corporate players in the global food chain reported record profits after the first quarter of 2008. These corporations are making a killing from the food crisis. ( GRAIN ) An international research project consisting of 900 representatives from multilateral organizations, civil society, national governments, the private sector and scientific institutions has produced a report that evaluates the relevance, quality and effectiveness of agricultural knowledge, science and technology (AKST) on development. This summary of the International Assessment on Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) report concludes that small-scale farmers and their traditional agricultural knowledge should play a greater role in production. Also, the report criticizes genetic modification (GM) in agriculture, pointing out that research on long-term effects of GM is lagging behind. The study warns that patenting genetic modifications undermines local farming practices and concentrates the ownership of resources. ( GreenFacts ) Hungry people are protesting around the globe as they struggle to feed themselves in the face of massive commodity price rises. Large agribusinesses claim they are working to solve the food crisis. Monsanto plans to design genetically modified crops that can squeeze even more yield from each acre of planted grain. But Big Agriculture actually benefits from the food crisis. Monsantos profit in the last quarter (February 2008) more than doubled, while Cargills profit jumped 42 percent in the same period. ( Wall Street Journal ) European subsidies for agriculture are contributing to rapidly rising food prices and the destruction of small-scale farming. These massive subsidies artificially cheapen EU products, making it impossible for small-scale farmers in poorer countries to compete. Critics have long protested the way in which these subsidies distort global agriculture and trade. In light of the 2008 food crisis, the EU subsidies are under heavy fire, from poor countries who suffer most, but also from within, by EU politicians and policymakers. ( Inter Press Service ) In the first half of 2008, the price of rice more than doubled, making it unaffordable for many Liberians, who have switched from rice to cheaper staple foods like spaghetti. Liberia depends almost completely on foreign imports of rice from the US and Asia. While the Liberian Minister for Agriculture optimistically notes that this might be an opportunity for Liberians to diversify their diets, this example shows how vulnerable poor, net food importing countries are to price shocks on the global market. (BBC) Korean authorities have found bone fragments even an entire spine - in shipments of US beef. Consequently, South Korea banned the import of US beef, as it did not comply with Korean food safety standards. This article reports on how the US uses Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations to force South Korea to remove the ban on US beef and relax food safety standards. Besides the health risk involved, domestic farmers get pushed off the market by subsidized US imports. The author concludes that FTAs pressure weaker nations into relinquishing their food sovereignty, their control of national food safety and their right to reject genetically modified products. ( Foreign Policy in Focus ) Biofuel production and livestock are important causes of the global food crisis. Both divert huge amounts of grain away from human mouths: 100 million and 760 million tons, respectively. The author states that consumers should eat as little meat as possible. The author concludes that it seems surreal that while half the world might not have anything to eat at all, those in rich countries have endless choices and barely notice the global food crisis. It is hard to understand how two such different food economies could occupy the same planet, until you realize that they feed off each other. ( AlterNet ) This article is highly critical of World Bank president Robert Zoellicks calls for further trade liberalization as a response to the global food crisis. According to the author, trade liberalization is not the solution but the cause of the food crisis. The 2007-2008 food price rises have had such a severe effect on the worlds poor because of the trade liberalization the World Bank, World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund propagate. These policies limit social safety nets and public sector agricultural support, push small-scale farmers out of the market, and lead to the sale of grain stockpiles to service foreign debt. Consequently, there is no buffer between price shocks and the bellies of the poorest people on earth. ( Guardian ) This Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy report argues that while high commodity prices such as those of 2007 and 2008 can potentially benefit farmers, this is not the case in the short-term. The immediate effects of high food prices are to place extreme stress on the urban and rural poor of net-food importing, low-income countries. The IATP urges trade ministers at the UN Conference on Trade and Development in Accra, 2008 (UNCTAD XII) to review three decades of commodity market liberalization critically and to take action to rebalance power relations in agricultural markets. Joachim von Braun, director general of the International Food Policy Research Institute . calls for policy action in three areas to address the massive rise in food prices. Firstly, he proposes the implementation of social safety nets to help the poor who can no longer afford essential foodstuffs. Secondly, he calls for increased investment in agriculture. Finally, stating that export restrictions and import subsidies only add to global trade distortions that harm poor countries, he calls for other trade policy reforms, such as the removal of trade barriers by rich countries. This article analyzes the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), an initiative by the Bill amp Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. AGRA aims to end poverty and hunger by restructuring Africas food systems. But, this reform may ultimately serve the interests of agribusinesses like Monsanto, by creating a new market for genetically modified seeds and agrochemicals. AGRAs philanthro-capitalism overrides local agricultural techniques by focusing on global market-based solutions. This diverts attention from the role that global markets systemically play in creating hunger and poverty in the first place. ( Pambazuka ) This New York Times editorial discusses the human cost of the rich worlds subsidized appetite for biofuels. When it seemed that global food supply might run out in the past, food production grew to meet demand. This time it might not be so easy, with the demand for biofuels diverting food into energy for cars, rather than human beings. The UN warns against massive price increases for food grains and declining global food stocks, officials say as a result, the worlds poor are facing a perfect storm. Both supply and demand side factors have produced these changes global warming, increased production for animal feed and biofuels. The World Food Program representatives believe that the change in these factors is permanent. ( International Herald Tribune ) In 2005, a famine struck Malawi and a third of the population needed emergency food aid. In 2007, the same country is the number one southern African supplier of corn to the World Food Program. The Malawian government ignored the World Banks pressure to implement free market policies and to cut back on subsidies, and instead deepened their fertilizer subsidies, boosting the productivity of the countrys agriculture. ( International Herald Tribune ) Global cereal prices are increasing due to low global food stocks and higher transportation costs. The prices of cereal cause food inflation across the world, and further increase the price of bread, meat and milk. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) expect prices to remain high for several years, which could result in hunger for the worlds poor, as they will be unable to purchase sufficient amounts of food. ( OneWorld South Asia ) The price of food is increasing worldwide and several countries are on the brink of a food crisis. The reason for the increase is due to a combination of rising oil prices, greater amounts of food crops used for bio-fuel production, and unstable weather conditions. The rise in food prices has devastating consequences for the worlds poor who cannot afford to buy basic necessities and food to live above the subsistence level. ( Guardian ) The author of this YaleGlobal article expresses concern over a looming global food crisis. Food crop harvests are falling while consumption is increasing, and the author fears this will lead to social and political unrest. Also worrying is the increasing share of agriculture devoted to biofuels. Combined with growing consumption, environmental degradation, watershortages and urbanization and massive agricultural subsidies in rich countries this could spell disaster. Further, climate change leaves poor equatorial countries extremely vulnerable to weather changes and seasonal variation. Crop prices are rising to historic levels, reversing a long-term trend of steadily lowering world crop prices. For the third consecutive year the world is consuming more food grain than it produces, making the gap between demand and supply the largest in thirty years. This has dramatic consequences for poor countries as they are increasingly vulnerable to bad harvests. Further, high food grain prices will reduce poor countries purchasing power and hinder economic growth. Also, humanitarian groups fear that they will lose ground against hunger, as their food aid budgets will not reach as far as planned. ( Wall Street Journal ) This Foreign Policy in Focus article illustrates the negative economic effects of the US-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (FTA) on Korean agriculture. The FTA would seriously undermine Korean agricultural production and food safety laws, leading to a complete restructuring of the local agricultural practice. Koreas National Policy Institute estimates that the countrys agriculture may well disappear within the next 10-15 years as a result of the new FTA. Washington has suggested that the FTA could function as a blueprint for other US trade liberalization agreements with countries across Asia, which would lead to similar adverse consequences. A surge in demand for alternative fuels such as ethanol has caused the price of corn to rise to its highest level in ten years. Because corn is a staple food for billions of impoverished people around the world, these price increases have potentially devastating implications for both global poverty and food security, argues this Foreign Affairs article. The authors further point out that political and corporate interests dominate the ethanol industry, so that corn growers in rich countries receive substantial government subsidies which diminish the competitiveness of their developing country counterparts. This report published by Norwegian Church Aid, Danish Church Aid, Church of Sweden and Brot-fur-die-Welt finds that ever since African governments began liberalizing trade, food security has worsened on the continent. In particular, economic liberalization has harmed poor subsistence farmers. The author suggests that to achieve the Millennium Development Goal of halving hunger by 2015,the World Bank and local governments must abandon their present governance and liberalization policies. FAIR USE NOTICE. This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U. S.C 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 866 UN Plaza Suite 4050 New York, NY 10017 USA Phone: 1-646-553-3460 gpftglobalpolicy. org Copyright copy 2005 - 2017 Global Policy Forum. Designed by JoomlArt Joomla is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License.
No comments:
Post a Comment